Yes the charge could be trumped up. With celebrities involved sometimes people come up with novel ways to get cash or do someone in. The girl was probably used as a pawn or it didn't happen at all, after all these years she may even genuinely believe it has happened too.
He plea bargained - in other words he was told by the DA: "We have a strong case. We'll send you away to St Quentin and you'll be butt-raped by Bubba and Co for 20 years. Or you can plead guilty and we'll give you a slap on the wrist. Save yourself the trouble."
Obviously people are emotional and will like you, go with the testimony of a girl who was seduced, drugged and raped by this guy who since has not been convicted in Europe of anything related to this. I guess he switched off his libido for 30 years. Right?
The case wasn't clear cut.
And even if he really had sex with this girl where was her mother and why did she let this happen - and yes it's possible for a drunk guy to mistake a girl who looks 18 but is 13 for a legal girl.
It's also been 30 years and the way he was caught by the Swiss is fishy and unkosher. Thugs frequently escape to the US from Europe and they don't get extradited - I believe Europe should not let him go till the US rescinds these crazy charges or he should be tried in Europe.
Anyway google it, lots of people believe in this guy and ask yourself why they do? People hate and call Gary Glitter bad names and people still refer to MJ as a pedo even though he bribed the parents of that one kid not to press charges, why should a far better man be treated like a criminal. I disagree.
Put yourself in his shoes. If you were at a party and some girl who should not have been there said you raped her, and everyone called you a f-ng child molester, do you think you'd get a fair hearing? Judging by most responses here - I seriously doubt it, and it goes against all psychology because the guy was successfully married to numerous beautiful women and pedo's don't do that, or if they do its a facade and they rape relatives and other kids. Secondly the girl does not look like a kid (and we have testimony on that) and so he did wrong not to verify her age but he's no child molester or animal. Cases like these - if this is genuine - are very common. At the end it's her word against his. And people won't defend someone accused of this because he must obviously be guilty.
If you know my record on this forum I usually back the girl in such cases but in this case the whole thing is very fishy. Anyway a real pedo child rapist wouldn't have two governments standing in on his behalf which goes to show what people in Europe think of those charges or do you think Sarkozy would defend a child molester in public?
But look at the facts though,
-Hes never denied having sex or drugging her
- He pleaded guilty
- He fled (which does nothing to help his credibilty)
- Ive googled pictures of her when she 13, she looks 13 imo.
- Hes settled with her financially.
Also celebrities are quite good at hiring the best lawyers to discredit many accusers, weve seen it dozens of times in hollywood already. Why do you believe he is innocent though?