DreamKing
Honorary Master
They outsource, or insource? Whatever
"outsource" ==> not their children, they kidnapped the poor families children only.
"in source" ==> no idea how.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
They outsource, or insource? Whatever
There's no shortage of unwanted throwaway children."outsource" ==> not their children, they kidnapped the poor families children only.
"in source" ==> no idea how.
Hyenas females have a fake penis. So therefore trans something.You better tell all the other animals that what they are doing is abnormal.
![]()
true, and most of them are from leftists.There's no shortage of unwanted throwaway children.
Cancer is something completely different. A child cannot decide after pressure at school that they suddenly have cancer. Children are indoctrinated in the UK and some parts of the US by trans people. This has tragic consequences. No one can convince a child that he or she has cancer.So do you complain about awareness months for different types of cancer too? Why should that genetic abnormality be normalised?
Being abnormal is being abnormal. I am sure you have googled the meaning of abnormal?You better tell all the other animals that what they are doing is abnormal.
![]()
Cancer is something completely different. A child cannot decide after pressure at school that they suddenly have cancer. Children are indoctrinated in the UK and some parts of the US by trans people. This has tragic consequences. No one can convince a child that he or she has cancer.
Silly analogy.
Being abnormal is being abnormal. I am sure you have googled the meaning of abnormal?
I'm as much of a leftist woketard as the next person but the "it happens in nature" argument is kinda silly. "Displaying homosexual behaviour" could be two guys grabbing each other's butts, it's not them marrying each other.You better tell all the other animals that what they are doing is abnormal.
![]()
I'm as much of a leftist woketard as the next person but the "it happens in nature" argument is kinda silly. "Displaying homosexual behaviour" could be two guys grabbing each other's butts, it's not them marrying each other.
Generally speaking, a black person who doesn't vote for the ANC is abnormal. Is it morally wrong for a black person to oppose the ANC?Being abnormal is being abnormal. I am sure you have googled the meaning of abnormal?
Yeah, gay animals in nature are like lesbians in porn.Agreed.
A better argument is "i'm going to do it - try and stop me."![]()
Just false.Generally speaking, a black person who doesn't vote for the ANC is abnormal. Is it morally wrong for a black person to oppose the ANC?
I'm as much of a leftist woketard as the next person but the "it happens in nature" argument is kinda silly. "Displaying homosexual behaviour" could be two guys grabbing each other's butts, it's not them marrying each other.
Oh that's a different argument that I'm not partaking in since I don't particularly care either way.The fact that it happens in nature is very much a valid argument for it not being abnormal.
One could also make other comparisons limited to humans such as the fact that LGBTQ makes up about 7% of the population while people who drive a BMW make up less than 0.2%.
So if being LGBTQ is abnormal (it's not), then a person who drives a BMW is 35 times as abnormal.
Would you consider someone "abnormal" if they said their favorite color is yellow? Because there are way less of them than LGBTQ people.
My point is that the argument that being LGBTQ is "abnormal" has not been validated with any kind of factual data. Cause the data shows that it is fairly common and completely normal. In humans and across nature.
The fact that it happens in nature is very much a valid argument for it not being abnormal.
One could also make other comparisons limited to humans such as the fact that LGBTQ makes up about 7% of the population while people who drive a BMW make up less than 0.2%.
So if being LGBTQ is abnormal (it's not), then a person who drives a BMW is 35 times as abnormal.
Would you consider someone "abnormal" if they said their favorite color is yellow? Because there are way less of them than LGBTQ people.
My point is that the argument that being LGBTQ is "abnormal" has not been validated with any kind of factual data. Cause the data shows that it is fairly common and completely normal. In humans and across nature.
Oh that's a different argument that I'm not partaking in since I don't particularly care either way.
All I'm saying is that just because animals might "display homosexual behaviour" doesn't necessarily make them homosexual.
Lol BS statistics.The fact that it happens in nature is very much a valid argument for it not being abnormal.
One could also make other comparisons limited to humans such as the fact that LGBTQ makes up about 7% of the population while people who drive a BMW make up less than 0.2%.
So if being LGBTQ is abnormal (it's not), then a person who drives a BMW is 35 times as abnormal.
Would you consider someone "abnormal" if they said their favorite color is yellow? Because there are way less of them than LGBTQ people.
My point is that the argument that being LGBTQ is "abnormal" has not been validated with any kind of factual data. Cause the data shows that it is fairly common and completely normal. In humans and across nature.
If you are going with self identification that is definitely a thing with many guys in the closet and even straight up coping with nonsense like only the bottom is the gay.So would you say the same about people?
Just because Jack "displays homosexual behaviour" doesn't necessarily make him homosexual?
Yep. Have you never met people who seem gay but aren't? Not to mention the way some footballers celebrate with their teammates is quite homo-erotic. There are plenty of examples. Again, it depends what homosexual behaviour is? Living with another man for 50 years and engaging in homosex is a little different, wouldn't you say?So would you say the same about people?
Just because Jack "displays homosexual behaviour" doesn't necessarily make him homosexual?