JFC.Generally speaking, a black person who doesn't vote for the ANC is abnormal. Is it morally wrong for a black person to oppose the ANC?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
JFC.Generally speaking, a black person who doesn't vote for the ANC is abnormal. Is it morally wrong for a black person to oppose the ANC?
Hey, Wiki!This is your guy:
Michael Levin (born 21 May 1943) is an American philosopher and writer.
Torture
In the 1982 article "The Case for Torture", Levin argued that "there are situations where torture is not merely permissible but morally mandatory." Levin reiterated this view in 2009.
Race
Throughout the 1990s Levin frequently wrote about race differences in intelligence, biology, and morality for the white nationalist publication American Renaissance. The Southern Poverty Law Center classifies him as an "unabashed white supremacist."
Michael Levin - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
How do you exit the matrix? Yawning?Hey, Wiki!
Nice one pulling a @Cray character assassination there. So what if those were his arguments and writings? What on earth do they have to do with the topic at hand?
There's nothing wrong with what's mentioned above. What do you disagree with?
What you've just done is a telltale symptom of someone stuck deep in the matrix.
He said that "any biologist" will tell you that homosexuality is abnormal.Hey, Wiki!
Nice one pulling a @Cray character assassination there. So what if those were his arguments and writings? What on earth do they have to do with the topic at hand?
There's nothing wrong with what's mentioned above. What do you disagree with?
What you've just done is a telltale symptom of someone stuck deep in the matrix.
Well if you put a bunch of bulls in a pen with no cow they'll jump each other. If you add a cow they'll ignore each other(but she won't have a good time. They cannot reason, just hormones)Do they have to actually shag each other to be homosexual?
What if they just spoon a bit, like chums?
You can't reason with hate...I still don't see why something being abnormal is inherently immoral. If we for the sake of the argument concede that homosexuality is abnormal, then what? Woolworths has celebrated holidays from Islam and Judaism that are abnormal in a South African context. It doesn't make any of these things bad.
No meme? Disappointing
Not just a meme... where's the motivational post card?No meme? Disappointing
And seriously, man the f**k up, you consistently sh*t post about people who are "deep in the matrix", as if they haven't reached your level of perception, character assassination is all you do.
Not just a meme... where's the motivational post card?
He's napping again...![]()
Lol... I think you're lost, buddy
Damn you’re fast, was amended within like 20 secs lolLol... I think you're lost, buddy![]()
Lol!Damn you’re fast, was amended within like 20 secs lol![]()
Who said anything about reasoning ? If Bible had verse like 'Thou shall suck deick every day', then likes of rambo & rietrot would be doing it every day."Homosexuality is abnormal therefore it is immoral" is not sound reasoning.
What now?Says the guy quoting Wikipedia?
May I introduce Prof Michael Levin, a biologist, who has studied it from both a biological and philosophical side. Y
Michael Levin (/ˈlɛvɪn/; born 21 May 1943) is an American philosopher and writer. He is professor emeritus of philosophy at City University of New York. He has published on metaphysics, epistemology, race, homosexuality, animal rights, the philosophy of archaeology, the philosophy of logic, philosophy of language, and the philosophy of science.
Levin's central research interests are in epistemology (reliabilism and Gettier problems) and in philosophy of race.
Education
Levin graduated from Stuyvesant High School in 1960, earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1964, and studied at Columbia University where he received a doctoral degree in 1969. His dissertation was titled "Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics".[1]
Hey, Wiki!
Nice one pulling a @Cray character assassination there. So what if those were his arguments and writings? What on earth do they have to do with the topic at hand?
There's nothing wrong with what's mentioned above. What do you disagree with?
What you've just done is a telltale symptom of someone stuck deep in the matrix.