Kloofvreter
Honorary Master
I'd rather take that chance, than live with the guilt of killing the baby for the rest of my life.
LOL, 'killing the baby" I love how people play with word. You see, that's the difference between us, I would not.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I'd rather take that chance, than live with the guilt of killing the baby for the rest of my life.
LOL, 'killing the baby" I love how people play with word. You see, that's the difference between us, I would not.![]()
Ja, it's easy to deny responsibility, but if you watch them perform the abortion, it's pretty easy to see the doctor taking the moving baby in the forceps and tearing him limb from limb. I don't see how that can be anything but a killing. To deny it is to be dishonest to yourself.
We both believe the opposite is true, so no point in continuing this discussion![]()
Ah, the Republican wayDon't abort, but when parents can't support babies because of poverty/medical bills they can get fscked because state support is socialism
![]()
I doubt doctors give a schite, majority of them suffer from a god complex as it is.
A friend had to have her one ovary removed for medical reasons which is not to bad seeing she still has the other one so hormones don't become and issue. The idiot doctor removed the wrong ovary! She had to go back and have the problematic one removed a second time round and now have to take those hormonal supplement things.
Reporting them to the medical council or whatever it is called is almost pointless. First they are reviewed by their 'peers' (like a band of thieves), second they will stall as long as they can (something about a statute of limitations on medical claims), trying to sue them requires money and they usually have more than their victims.
As someone else mentioned they also 'kill' people under the guise of surgical risks. I knew one guy that went in for a minor procedure, he got nicked where he was not suppose to be nicked and died of septicaemia or something.
.....or not.
Unfortunately doctors sometimes are given to much credit. They probably kill more people than they save in theatre....
How many docs enter the profession for the money ?
This happened in Australia, not America.![]()
I would recommend taking a black permanent ink marker and drawing an arrow on what has to be removed. (THIS ONE --->)
....So?
So, it sounds like you are talking about the US Republican party... which has nothing to do with this thread.
The Australian Republican Party are Secular Humanist.
Take a look for yourself...
[video=youtube;c82WUgjIUng]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c82WUgjIUng[/video]
I was actually talking about posters in this thread![]()
I think it's a bit of a reach to say the kid is screaming, after watching that video.
Abortion is nasty, I agree. I have had the good fortune to have a wonderful kid involved in my life for the last year or so. Watching him grow up, and knowing the kids idiot father wanted to abort him, has really made me think hard about abortion.
Ultimately, it's the mothers choice, and I resist any efforts to take that choice away from her.
So how come killing with intention one second after birth is murder, but killing with intention one second before birth is not?
I would love to be able to say it is only about the mother's choice, but it is not. There is another life involved. Who speaks for the life of the child?
So how come killing with intention one second after birth is murder, but killing with intention one second before birth is not?
Please quote a source for this.
So how come killing with intention one second after birth is murder, but killing with intention one second before birth is not?
I would love to be able to say it is only about the mother's choice, but it is not. There is another life involved. Who speaks for the life of the child?
So how come killing with intention one second after birth is murder, but killing with intention one second before birth is not?
I would love to be able to say it is only about the mother's choice, but it is not. There is another life involved. Who speaks for the life of the child?