"Zille violated Constitution", Public Protector

noxibox said:
It's pretty simple. If the police only have enough resources to either hunt around for hippies smoking a bit of cannabis or go after a gang of rapists and murderers they should be spending their resources on the latter. It really doesn't matter if both are illegal activities.

I can't imagine where you'd move to avoid melodrama between politicians. Maybe New Zealand. The country does have a reputation for being a bit less exciting than being in a coma.
Click to expand...
Its legal ,maybe the police should stop looking for criminals where there is none.

Still want to know which part of the constitution she and the other dude violate.
 
Excalibur said:
So you would defend Zuma or Bathabile Dlamini for doing the same thing?
Click to expand...

why? is this all a setup to soften the blow when their time comes? dilute the spotlight on other peoples uselessness
 
Mila said:
Its legal ,maybe the police should stop looking for criminals where there is none.

Still want to know which part of the constitution she and the other dude violate.
Click to expand...

You are just being obtuse now this is the part the PP has used.

So section 136(2) of the Constitution requires the premier not to expose herself to any situation involving the risk of a conflict between her official responsibilities and her private interests. So in this instance she violated the Constitution, especially the Executive Members Ethics Act," said the Public Protector on Wednesday.
 
Could the regular anti DA crowd please point out which part of the constitution she violated or how Zille or her son benefitted? I asked earlier but it seems no one can answer? And no I'm not aligned to any political party, I vote for non idiots whenever I can find one in the political landscape. Not easy.
 
dj2381 said:
Could the regular anti DA crowd please point out which part of the constitution she violated or how Zille or her son benefitted? I asked earlier but it seems no one can answer? And no I'm not aligned to any political party, I vote for non idiots whenever I can find one in the political landscape. Not easy.
Click to expand...
Jesus it's in the ****ing article read the goddam thing
 
EADC said:
You are just being obtuse now this is the part the PP has used.

So section 136(2) of the Constitution requires the premier not to expose herself to any situation involving the risk of a conflict between her official responsibilities and her private interests. So in this instance she violated the Constitution, especially the Executive Members Ethics Act," said the Public Protector on Wednesday.
Click to expand...
Tablets were available to anyone who wanted to start a workshop?

Did you read it?
 
dj2381 said:
Tablets were available to anyone who wanted to start a workshop?

Did you read it?
Click to expand...
Irrelevant I am pointing out what part of the constitution the PP used.

Not if her interpretation is correct or not.
 
EADC said:
You are just being obtuse now this is the part the PP has used.

So section 136(2) of the Constitution requires the premier not to expose herself to any situation involving the risk of a conflict between her official responsibilities and her private interests. So in this instance she violated the Constitution, especially the Executive Members Ethics Act," said the Public Protector on Wednesday.
Click to expand...
Except there was no gratification, which is the illegal part
 
The ANC Protector upholds the parties priorities.

Public protector clears DA's W Cape leader over R3,000 cake
The leader of the ANC in the Western Cape provincial legislature, Khaya Magaxa, laid the complaint with Mkhwebane’s office, asking her to probe an alleged breach of the ethics code by Madikizela for failing to declare gifts received at the party.
Click to expand...

5 of the public protector's findings that made headlines in 2018

In case there was any doubt as to who this POS works for.
 
EADC said:
Irrelevant I am pointing out what part of the constitution the PP used.

Not if her interpretation is correct or not.
Click to expand...
You are just a couple of steps away from being called names and accused of being an ANC supporter and defending Mkhwebane, I can feel it, I see them circling you and you are not even aware.
 
thechamp said:
You are just a couple of steps away from being called names and accused of being an ANC supporter and defending Mkhwebane, I can feel it, I see them circling you and you are not even aware.
Click to expand...
I am already an EFF supporter guess could be worse they could label me a FF+ voter.
 
EADC said:
You are just being obtuse now this is the part the PP has used.

So section 136(2) of the Constitution requires the premier not to expose herself to any situation involving the risk of a conflict between her official responsibilities and her private interests. So in this instance she violated the Constitution, especially the Executive Members Ethics Act," said the Public Protector on Wednesday.
Click to expand...

it was a free service to the community, what is she exposing herself to?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X