Poor broadband is holding TV back in SA

Same theme from both sources. If they were so concerned then why don't they buy out a network operator and manage their own cable network. Alternatively why don't they form a strategic partnership with an existing network operator and offer cable TV?

i.e. put their money where their mouth is ...
 
As was mentioned, if Multichoice was really thinking this as a "problem" to their bottom line, they would start with Mweb. There was some big movements and shout-outs made earlier this year with all the inter-connect and LLU stuff coming from Mweb, but somewhere not much has come from in terms of "shaking up the market" . A few price drops, but speed is still not great, most people are still most likely on 1MB type of connections (and even that was primarily a Telkom upgrade thing, otherwise it would be 384kb connections instead).

Mweb is actually quickly becoming the more expensive broadband in the market. They seem to do a shakeup once every 5 years and then sit back and wait for the market to pass them by completely before they do anything.

I've been for Mweb for like a year, and the price did not change, the service did not change (no speed increases or no new service options ). They still haven't figured out we don't want to pay per minute for WiFi (you'd think all this talk of Digital TV , that getting people on public WiFi would be a big deal for these guys, guess not). So maybe Multichoice should look to their holding company and ask who is really holding who back here....

So that 2 year prediction? No way. Not even Mweb or Multichoice change that fast. Naspers is probably going to first spend all their money exploring the Middle East and forget about SA . Kinda like MTN, who makes alot of money overseas, but you'll never guess it looking at their performance in SA.
 
Last edited:
Mweb is actually quickly becoming the more expensive broadband in the market.

Actually openweb is more expensive and so far you are getting what you are paying for. Shall we do a quick compare between IS, MTNNS and Mweb ?
 
Last edited:
Actually openweb is more expensive and so far you are getting what you are paying for. Shall we do a quick compare between IS, MTNNS and Mweb ?

Web Africa said the same thing, so it's not about "you get what you pay for" (and this is not the thread to argue "Who is the best ISP") . The point of the article is that broadband is still considered very expensive, period. Mweb has not changed their consumer prices in ages while others have become cheaper , hence for a "sister company" to come out and complain about the cost of broadband and the speed is rather hypocritical? I'm still paying R530 for a 4MB service on Mweb, i can get 10MB for the same price at another ISP (fortunately for Mweb my line can't go that fast).
 
Web Africa said the same thing, so it's not about "you get what you pay for" (and this is not the thread to argue "Who is the best ISP") . The point of the article is that broadband is still considered very expensive, period. Mweb has not changed their consumer prices in ages while others have become cheaper , hence for a "sister company" to come out and complain about the cost of broadband and the speed is rather hypocritical? I'm still paying R530 for a 4MB service on Mweb, i can get 10MB for the same price at another ISP (fortunately for Mweb my line can't go that fast).

Sure cheapest ISP is best performing one ever :)

Just strange that when I run them back to back I get a different story.
 
Shame... 4mbs uncapped performing better than a 10mbs uncapped :(

mweb (4mbs uncapped)



WebAfrica (10mbs capped)



AfriHost (10mbs uncapped)
 
The biggest constraint for MultiChoice to provide “TV everywhere” in Africa has been the speed and cost of broadband, Aletta Alberts, head of content at MultiChoice told attendees at a Discovery Networks panel discussion.

OK but broadband comes in many different forms and would be used at different points for any particular broadcast:
  • peering links between broadcasters such as SABC and eTV to DSTV and TopTV (so people can watch the news and weather predictions via a decoder)
  • Poison Ivy's "teleportation" devices that uplink locally hosted/produced content to satellites for broadcasting
  • downlink from satellites to consumers' dishes
  • IPTV
  • digital terrestrial transmissions would have to start out using fibre optic to get to Sentech's transmitters for broadcasting
and each of those has a cost component.

Is there any particular broadband component that Aletta Alberts blames for the extremely high price of DSTV?

Alberts said that she believes many people in management in the TV industry think fast, affordable broadband in South Africa is 5–7 years away, but she thinks it’s 2 years away.

To substantiate her view, Alberts said that Dimension Data indicated in meetings with her that they believe fibre connections will be common in urban South Africa in 2 years.

Great, so Monochoice will abandon satellite transmissions in 2 years time and switch to using IPTV over fibre optic? I wonder how much Monochoice will charge for that? Or maybe she is just preparing us for R2000 per month IPTV bill shock in 2015.

Strange how IPTV doesn't cost an arm and a leg in other countries, must be the "unique" geography/topography in SA (again) :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X