South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Not me. The only emails I've been getting were from my bank...telling me to watch out for XYZ that is specifically targeting said bank. Never got the actual phishing mail that was being warned against...I guess google spam caught it.I've been receiving tonnes of "SARS- Efiling Tax Return" and "E-filing Tax Return"
Do tell...I'm not aware of any IMSI monitoring? Not sure its even feasible...people switch phones all the time.AND when the IMSI number is being monitored too (meaning SIM clones won't work either) !
Strange how the banks or networks are not mentioning FICA.
The result of most scams = money transferred to other accounts before being withdrawn at atms.
Surely these accounts lead to people who actually own them, if the account owners details are fake, then the bank is at fault for not verifying FICA details correctly.
Ultimately, banks should be able to trace when the money goes to up until the atm.
Edit - also, its time that SARS and banking websites all use a higher level of ssl certs which atleast turn the address bar green.
I think these institutions owe it to their customers to provide training/help in regards to how to verify the website you are using. Example, how to look at the ssl cert and verify that its authentic.
Uhm this is actually explained in the article. The scammer gets an innocent "friend" to lend them their account for a nominal fee (probably some random person he sits next to on a taxi). By the time someone finds the owner of the account, the scammer is long gone and the owner will have no clue what happened.
I wonder how long the banks take to trace people and how successful it actually is. We have all these RICA and FICA laws, but we never hear about any of this actually being used to capture any criminals. Is there any stats from banks and cellphones companies out there regarding this? Or is RICA and FICA, as we all suspected, just a bunch of mismanaged paperwork?
Owner of the account must then be held liable maybe, unless they can provide their "friends" details...
Just read some of the front page comments and I have to let off steam somewhere...
Sweet mother of Hitchens!
Getting your username and password are the least impressive parts of the attack[/B}
and
that's what people are focussing on?!
Phew. Much better.
Just read some of the front page comments and I have to let off steam somewhere...
Sweet mother of Hitchens! Getting your username and password are the least impressive parts of the attack and that's what people are focussing on?!
Phew. Much better.
EDIT: Just clarifying that my little rant isn't directed at anyone in this thread, or anyone in particular. For instance I completely agree with TirNaNog: Don't fall for the scam. Secondly: Don't click on dodgy links from your insecure PC. If you must, use a VM or something.

Just found this in my spam folder. It was sent from [email protected]
Dear ABSA Client,
Attention! Your online service has been deauthorized.
We suspect someone other than you with IP 217.190.182.35
making series of incorrect attempts with your card number.
Please confirm your recent activities with us to show
you are not away at this time.
It should be confirmed as soon as possible to
keep it from getting intermitted.
Begin the verification process <-- Url to http: // niepelnosprawnyturysta.yapis.net /semb/onac.mern/situ.mery/naid.ferb.htm
Note: This email was sent from a secure server,
please SIGNON to email us as mails sent to this address cannot be answered.
...Check Account :wtf: What's the chances of a bank spelling cheque wrong?