MTN: Interconnect cuts will wreak havoc on mobile industry

MTN Official Press Statement

Mobile operator MTN SA today told parliament that MTN was willing to reduce interconnect rates but had serious concerns about the potential impact of sudden and substantial cuts on its investment plans, including broadband roll-out, and measures that benefit poorer people and communities.

Karel Pienaar, Managing Director of MTN SA, also told the parliamentary portfolio committee on communication that MTN has invested more on infrastructure in the past three years than its profit in that period.

He said the South African mobile telephone industry was a success story.

The industry had delivered a world-class network that had created hundreds of thousands of jobs, promoted social development and boosted the economy.

Interconnect - the rate mobile operators charge each other to receive calls on their networks - had provided the revenue that had enabled mobile operators to meet government’s developmental objectives. This included bringing mobile access to remote rural areas, enabling poor communities and individuals to connect at minimal cost, and providing broadband services that are helping to bridge the digital divide.

Pienaar said that to assume that reduced call tariffs would result from a cut in interconnect rates is not necessarily correct. An international study of more than 24 countries had shown that a 10% cut in interconnect rates was followed by a 10% average rise in retail call rates, he said.

Pienaar explained that interconnect fees and call tariffs were two of MTN’s principal revenue streams, together with Sms and data revenue. If a cut in one source of revenue was followed by a cut in a second revenue stream, there would be a double impact on revenue.

Pienaar said that MTN was willing to reduce interconnect rates, but this had to be done gradually over a period of time to avoid “business model shock”.

“MTN is investing a record R7,5 billion this year in infrastructure expansion, technology and quality improvements and FIFA stadium coverage for the 2010 Soccer World Cup. This huge investment is based on a long-term view of the revenue the investment will produce. If you reduce that revenue through interconnect cuts, and then seek further reductions in other revenue streams such as retail tariffs, our business model will by necessity have to alter.”

Pienaar said claims that South African cellphone call rates are among the highest in the world were factually wrong.

“Mobile tariffs have gone down steadily in real terms over 10 years, a period of high inflation including sharp rises in items such as food and energy. And competitive activity is bringing rates down further, even at current interconnect levels.”

Pienaar took specific issue with figures in a study used by the Department of Communications in its criticism of South African mobile operators. The study had used wrong or outdated information that painted an untrue picture of mobile tariffs, he said. In one case the department had based an international comparison on an old MTN rate that applied to less than 1% of customers and was no longer promoted.

The department had stated that South Africa had some of the highest data prices in the world. In reality, MTN’s data price of 19c a megabyte is among the cheapest in the world, and MTN data prices are 40 times cheaper than Chile, which the department had said was cheaper than South Africa.
Pienaar also disputed claims that prepaid tariffs used by poor people are higher than contract prices, by showing that average prepaid tariffs are cheaper than average contract rates.

“In addition to fair and innovative pricing, enabling calls at extremely low rates, South Africa has one of the lowest costs of mobile ownership in the world. People can get connected and stay connected for very little – 49 cents for a Sim card and one call every 90 days.

“This low cost of ownership, plus the rapid expansion of mobile networks, has given South Africa a mobile penetration rate – the percentage of the population with a mobile connection – of 104%. India, with which we are often compared, has a penetration of only 37%, concentrated in the cities while our networks reach 98% of our people.”

He said mobile take-up in countries like India and the United States had initially been very slow because recipients of calls had to pay for those calls. This is still the case in many countries, but in South Africa – at the moment – incoming calls are free, funded by the interconnect charge.

Rural coverage and affordable access for the poor had been funded by interconnect.

“Interconnect is a driver of South Africa’s world-class mobile coverage and the very high percentage of our population who are connected.”
If prices were too high, as critics claimed, the market would have shrunk. The continuous growth of the mobile industry showed the criticism was wrong.

Pienaar said MTN SA had invested R27 billion in infrastructure development since 1994. Over the past three years alone the company had invested R15 billion in South Africa, more than the total profits of its South African operations.
 
is this worth the development of infastructure at the end of the day or lets say 10 or 20 years time?
 
This chicken-little FUD is really getting on my nerves now.
Pienaar explained that interconnect fees and call tariffs were two of MTN’s principal revenue streams, together with Sms and data revenue. If a cut in one source of revenue was followed by a cut in a second revenue stream, there would be a double impact on revenue.
Doesnt sound like MTN considers interconnects to be a zero sum game.
 
Last edited:
I think I speak for all of us when I say
"Stop Lying!"
 
What a load of bull. I know I just said this in a related post, so sorry but I can't bite my tongue anymore with this crap.

They should force no interconnect charge and allow the companies to reclaim the loss via a price increase (ie no price increase or decrease to the clients at the end of the month / same profit for the companies), then from there competition can lower the price and the market would be much more appealing to other companies to enter.

High interconnect rates are there to make it difficult for new entrants into the market, so scrap it altogether and allow them to reclaim the loss elsewhere.

I bet MTN/Vodacom won't like that idea despite it having no immediate effect on their profit.
 
Hey MTN, Vodacom - You have had your fill gorging on the local consumer market and making a glutton of yourselves - maybe you should bite the bullet for a while...
 
After making obscene profits for a decade and this industry is basically profiteering, day of reckoning is here !

Only the spoilt shareholders will feel the difference - the majority of the infrastructure is long gone paid for
 
// Same response i had to Vodacom yesterday - suck my sweaty balls - its our turn to **** back
 
Mmm, perhaps they should stop advertising so much. You see Vodacom everywhere on sport channels, the same goes for MTN, i saw an ad on CNN on the weekend from them about the world cup.
 
This chicken-little FUD is really getting on my nerves now.Doesnt sound like MTN considers interconnects to be a zero sum game.

It is not with the current disparity in rates:)
 
lmao.. can anyone tell me what their net profit was for the last 15 yrs?

sim cost = bull because the operators flooded the market with sims while it was possible, now that rica is in this kind of model doesn't work so they might as well go back to selling at selected brand stores etc as they need to collect this data. No more pick up a sim and off i go.

The main issue they having is this.. the revenue will not necessarily be lost entirely but there will be no way to recoup the same revenue. Sure they can say increase costs.. but e.g. cell-c who was running at a loss currently will not be increasing their usage costs so if they did this combined with mobile number portability etc they get screwed as people switch over.. and since everyone has gotten use to using multiple sims data usage on hsdap/3g is not as attractive besides you can just dump the sim in a dedicated data device, lots of new devices coming out now.
 
They are talking rubbish. Some people will try to defend the un-defendable!! Pathetic excuses from our telecoms. This saga reeks of collusion, pure and simple.
 
To RPM, and all the Staff Reporters:

I know I am asking for a lot, but it would be nice if someone, with expert knowledge, could write an article for myBB, to explain the real costs, and intricacies of interconnect rates, so that Joe Public can understand what it really means, in detail.

I nice detailed article, with examples, and actual figures which mimic the real world reality would be nice.

We've had numerous people in the forums giving their own explanations, all with varying degrees of accuracy, usage of correct terminology, etc. The last few articles on myBB have sparked heated debate and discussions. So an article would be really nice,.

The article could be titled: Interconnect rates: a detailed explanation

And could discuss the following issues:
- the zero sum game - is it really a zero-sum game (or very close to it)?
- if it is not a zero-sum game, who will be the net winners and losers from the operators (cell operators, Telkom, the VANS like Vox, Mweb, Orion, and other VOIP providers)
- the effect it will have on the soon-to-be launched Telkom Mobile
- the effect it will have on Cell C and Virgin Mobile

All this is very interesting, but will require someone with real expert knowledge to do some work.

Its an idea. Hopefully such an article will be written...
 
This people are growing fat of the clientelle through over charging, and now they are all trying the same **** telkom pulled when they were told they must uncap local bandwidth (hows that going by the way...)

the level of service MTN provides isnt even worth half the price i have had to pay for my contract for the last 2 years. Price cuts are in order.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X