2007/2008 WI tour to SA thread

I hope its a good 3rd test!!

Like the India vs Aus!!! Thats what a test match should be like IMO:p

We are dealing with two far more polite teams here...

As for my view of the Aussies.... rather no comment! They get away with a lot of cr_p... suppose that's what happens when you are the big boy on the playground.
 
Pathetic ....

So Gibbs get's dropped for 1 test and then bring him back?

He hasn't scored a century for 3yrs and is still in the national squad.

Hershie needs to go play provincial cricket and prove that he is back in form.

Yeah I was wondering the same thing, the man magically regained his form in one week. Diepenaar should have replaced Mckenzie.
 
Pathetic ....

So Gibbs get's dropped for 1 test and then bring him back?

He hasn't scored a century for 3yrs and is still in the national squad.

Hershie needs to go play provincial cricket and prove that he is back in form and worthy of his test place.

Yeah, he hasn't had a good year.... below are his career stats vs his last 12 months stats....

Career ave 42.05
12 mnth ave 27.75
 
Last edited:
Pathetic ....

So Gibbs get's dropped for 1 test and then bring him back?

He hasn't scored a century for 3yrs and is still in the national squad.

Hershie needs to go play provincial cricket and prove that he is back in form.

Yeah I reckon Boeta can consider himself a little unlucky. Seems he isn't in with the right crowd IE. Smith and Mickey Mouse...

I would have been very tempted to open with AB and Smith, seems the 2 of them thrived off each others positive energy in the 2ND innings in the 2ND test. If the 2 of them get off to a positive start they can win the match for SA in the 1ST session by a.) seeing off the new ball b.) scoring at around 5 an over c.) demoralizing the fielding side but alternatively if they go cheaply that advantage is out the window...

Gibbs is a very lucky fellow to get another bite so soon after being dropped. Let's see how he handles the pressure!!!
 
Yeah I was wondering the same thing, the man magically regained his form in one week. Diepenaar should have replaced Mckenzie.

Actually ....

I really dont understand,

I thought ok, maybe it's a quota thing, but why not slip Duminy in and move AB up the order.

Why is Gibbs being persisted with ?

I just dont get it.
 
We are dealing with two far more polite teams here...

As for my view of the Aussies.... rather no comment! They get away with a lot of cr_p... suppose that's what happens when you are the big boy on the playground.
Agreed, the mo%^&$&ers are kings of sledge but can't take it when they on the receiving end...
 
Im kinda hoping the Windies arent down and out because of the loss and they really bring it to the Porteas.

The summer tours in SA is always a walk over it was nice seeing some effort for a change coupled with the suspence of not knowing whats gonna happen.
 
Yeah I reckon Boeta can consider himself a little unlucky. Seems he isn't in with the right crowd IE. Smith and Mickey Mouse...

I would have been very tempted to open with AB and Smith, seems the 2 of them thrived off each others positive energy in the 2ND innings in the 2ND test. If the 2 of them get off to a positive start they can win the match for SA in the 1ST session by a.) seeing off the new ball b.) scoring at around 5 an over c.) demoralizing the fielding side but alternatively if they go cheaply that advantage is out the window...

Gibbs is a very lucky fellow to get another bite so soon after being dropped. Let's see how he handles the pressure!!!

I haven't seen Dipps play for a while to be honest, but always thought he was more suited to Tests than the run he got in the ODI's.

I just think he is a bit too slow for my liking, that's Dipps, Amla, Kallis, Prince ... they're not going to do wonders to the Run Rate, admittedly it's Test matches but you dont wanna go at a snails pace either.

IMO
 

The summer tours in SA is always a walk over it was nice seeing some effort for a change coupled with the suspence of not knowing whats gonna happen.

Not sure if I should be stoned for agreeing with JK8 :eek:
 
Probably for his experience and brilliant fielding but yeah if he doesn't score at least 50 within the next 2 innings he's a gonner for sure...

Doubt it, Gibbs cant be replaced easily he offers to much to the team, I find it weird how theres always one guy that take the blame when the team stuffs up. All the players brough nothing to the table in the 1st match except maybe Kallis, but Gibbs got the boot. And then the whole anti-climax with Mckenzie lol... what was that!?!
 
Probably for his experience and brilliant fielding but yeah if he doesn't score at least 50 within the next 2 innings he's a gonner for sure...

I hope he doesn't get it.

Experience cannot excuse a year without a test century, let alone 3 at international level.

Give it too someone younger and hungrier.


EDIT:

Doubt it, Gibbs cant be replaced easily he offers to much to the team

Not runs apparently ...... what was his job again ? Oh yes .... a batsmen .... silly me for thinking that he should fulfill his primary role.
 
I haven't seen Dipps play for a while to be honest, but always thought he was more suited to Tests than the run he got in the ODI's.

I just think he is a bit too slow for my liking, that's Dipps, Amla, Kallis, Prince ...
Agreed which is why it would be tactically shrewd to open with Smith and AB and give them license to attack the bowlers, put them off their rhythm, see off the new ball and make a significant opening stand at a rate of about 5 an over or better, then let the more orthodox batsmen follow...

The way they went about business against the Windies in the 2nd innings of the 2nd test was remarkable. Of course it's different setting a total then chasing a smallish total down but that aggressive approach is how the game should be played IMO.
 
I hope he doesn't get it.

Experience cannot excuse a year without a test century, let alone 3 at international level.

Give it too someone younger and hungrier.
As much as I like Gibbs I got to agree. He seems to have lost his edge somewhat in test cricket which is odd cause he is still scoring big runs in ODI's... Still you gotto say he is so due it's not funny. Don't be surprised if he scores big this game...
 
Sorry to keep quoting stats guys but that is probably what the selectors look at when deciding on players...

Dippennaars career test stats do not make for exceptional reading. In 38 test matches and 62 innings for SA he has an average of only 30.14, which is only slightly better than the 27 of Gibbs over the last 12 months that we are complaining about. At least Gibbs has a career average of over 40....
 

Doubt it, Gibbs cant be replaced easily he offers to much to the team, I find it weird how theres always one guy that take the blame when the team stuffs up. All the players brough nothing to the table in the 1st match except maybe Kallis, but Gibbs got the boot. And then the whole anti-climax with Mckenzie lol... what was that!?!

Hmm.... sorry, but I can't agree with you there. Gibbs is in the team as a batsmen and he got two ducks in the first test. You can't get more of a failure than that... and that was coming off a not so good year, and ages since the last century from him.

McKenzie had been scoring prolifically domestically and deserved a chance. He scored 23 more runs than Gibbs had in both innings of the 1st test and neither he nor the selectors can be blamed that he picked up an injury. Gibbs can count himself lucky that he did though....
 
Not sure if I should be stoned for agreeing with JK8 :eek:
You should be yes. While no one wants to see a one sided drubbing I would rather we get tested later in the year by England, India and OZ who are in fact the top ranked sides in the world. The Windies should be nothing more than fine tuning for us. They really not a good side, little depth and even less talent and we had better expose this in the 3rd test.

Bare in mind they ranked 8th in test cricket behind NZ whom we have just annihilated at home. We need forward momentum and that means annihilating the Windies too.

As mentioned before India, England and OZ beckon and away series's.
 
McKenzie had been scoring prolifically domestically and deserved a chance. He scored 23 more runs than Gibbs had in both innings of the 1st test

In addition to that it was a plumb of a delivery that got Neil out. He was looking rock solid prior to being dismissed, he certainly didn't give it away...
 
You should be yes. While no one wants to see a one sided drubbing I would rather we get tested later in the year by England, India and OZ who are in fact the top ranked sides in the world. The Windies should be nothing more than fine tuning for us. They really not a good side, little depth and even less talent and we had better expose this in the 3rd test.

Bare in mind they ranked 8th in test cricket behind NZ whom we have just annihilated at home. We need forward momentum and that means annihilating the Windies too.

As mentioned before India, England and OZ beckon and away series's.

Lol thats funny, talent??? thats all they have they not bad players they just dont get it right most of the time. When they do they can be a top ranked side!! Much like the Pakis but on a lower scale.
 
Sorry to keep quoting stats guys but that is probably what the selectors look at when deciding on players...

Dippers career test stats do not make for exceptional reading. In 38 test matches and 62 innings for SA he has an average of only 30.14, which is only slightly better than the 27 of Gibbs over the last 12 months that we are complaining about. At least Gibbs has a career average of over 40....

Selectors would be looking at Boeta's current form in the supersport series where he is doing pretty well this season with an average of over 50, 3x100's and 1x50 in 12 innings...

In fact Neils average is 41.75 while Boeta's is 51.81
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X