2007 Cricket World Cup (West Indies) thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingrob
  • Start date Start date
Hehe ..... perhaps, watching it on the tele takes all imagination out of it :D

Anyway, Sri Lanka tomorrow.

They are an awesome team. They've got good batsmen and a solid bowling line up with Vaas aka Captain Death , Malinga the Slinger and of course Murali. Vaas has a knack of knocking over Smith LBW early on.

My changes for the team. Captain Slowmo can stay but bring him in early only if there is a collapse and the innings needs to be rebuillt.

Drop Prince for Bosman.
And try to squeeze Nel in there somewhere. Nel bowls well to the left handed batsmen.

Smith
AB
Gibbs
Bosman
Boucher
Kemp
Pollock
Kallis
Langers
Nel
Ntini

Who did you put Nel in for?
 
Nel in place of Hall.

Not quite sure if Langers is part of the quota or not, otherwise hall back in and langers out :)
 
Nel in place of Hall.

Not quite sure if Langers is part of the quota or not, otherwise hall back in and langers out :)

I think Langers is part of the quota.

Hall did some really good death bowling though against OZ, like 3 off the last over...
 
Indeed, Hall did bowl better and the end :)

Well, then i guess Hall will be carrying drinks in my team then, cant mess with the quota.

EDIT: Maybe i should let Robin Peterson carry the drinks, that's about as far as he should ever get near the SA line up :P
 
Last edited:
Indeed, Hall did bowl better and the end :)

Well, then i guess Hall will be carrying drinks in my team then, cant mess with the quota.

EDIT: Maybe i should let Robin Peterson carry the drinks, that's about as far as he should ever get near the SA line up :P

hehe, what does the quota stipulate exactly?
 
Well ....

There is supposedly "no enorced" quota. You choose whether or not to believe it :)

P.S ... i have no problem with a quota
 
Well ....

There is supposedly "no enorced" quota. You choose whether or not to believe it :)

P.S ... i have no problem with a quota

Same here. The best 11 should play at all times and if this can include players of colour then great.
 
mccrack i think your being a bit harsh on peterson

you realize he is the only decent spinner we have

bosman is a great batsmen and good for the quota so its a win win
 
I'm not sure about Bosman - he's terrific in Twenty20 but I haven't been too impressed with him so far in the 50 over format.

Maybe it's in the mindset, if we could train him to treat a 50 over match as an extended Twenty20 match, and even if he only lasts 10-15 overs we could very well have the worlds next dangerous batsman.
 
Anyone prefer listening to the cricket on the radio over watching it on the tele? Or maybe i'm the only warped one :D

702 ftw!!!11

doobiwan, Peterson may be our best spinner, but I'm not sure he's good enough to expose to the Aussies, Sri Lankans or other top intl teams. It is a real problem we have - and Peterson is not the answer (nor Adams or Boje, for that matter).
 
bah.. tomorrow is an SA game yay :p Time to see what smith says to comentators about kallis
 
mccrack i think your being a bit harsh on peterson

you realize he is the only decent spinner we have
what do you base that on? Does his stats support this view?

From CricInfo (ODI):
Mat; Balls; Runs; Wkts ; BBI ; BBM; Ave; Econ; SR; 4; 5; 10
33; 1180; 931;16; 2/26; 2/26; 58.18; 4.73; 73.75;0;0;0

Strike rate of 73.75 and ave of 58.18 with 16 wickets in 33 matches!

Let us compare to Paul Adams:
Mat; Balls; Runs; Wkts ; BBI ; BBM; Ave; Econ; SR; 4; 5; 10
24;1109;815; 29; 3/26; 3/26; 28.10; 4.40; 38.24; 0;0;0
Strike rate of 38.24 and ave of 28.10 with 29 wickets in only 24 matches!

Now lets look at Justin Ontong who is doing so well for the Lions:
Mat; Balls; Runs; Wkts ; BBI ; BBM; Ave; Econ; SR; 4; 5; 10
21;538;396;9;3/30; 3/30; 44.00;4.41;59.77; 0;0;0
Strike rate of 59.77 and ave of 44.00 with 9 wickets in 21 matches. He has also bowled HALF (538) the balls that Petersen and Adams have.

Lets turn to Johan Botha's brief career:
Mat; Balls; Runs; Wkts ; BBI ; BBM; Ave; Econ; SR; 4; 5; 10
11;438;361;7;2/49; 2/49;51.57;4.94;62.57; 0;0;0
Strike rate of 62.57 and ave of 51.57 with 7 wickets in only 11 matches. He has also only bowled 438 balls.

Lastly, and this is the eye opener...Captain Smith who is NOT a recognised spinner:

Mat; Balls; Runs; Wkts ; BBI ; BBM; Ave; Econ; SR; 4; 5; 10
107;954;858;15; 3/30;3/30;57.20;5.39;63.60;0 ;0 ;0
Strike rate of 63.60 vs Petersen 73.75.
Average of 57.20 vs Petersen 58.18
Wickets - 15 vs Petersen 16
and balls bowled 954 vs Petersen of 1180.

So if Petersen is our ONLY decent spinner, why is our captain showing him up?
:confused:
 
bah.. tomorrow is an SA game yay :p Time to see what smith says to comentators about kallis
Don't think that they're going to say anything. However I found the following quite interesting:
Following the defeat to Australia, much was made of the manner in which Jacques Kallis batted for his 48, but Smith understandably didn't want to say anything too critical about a man whose batting has been the bedrock of recent success. "As we do after every game, win or lose, we debrief and discuss areas we can improve on," he said. "It was a hard thing for me to comment on at the time because I was with the doctor and the physio getting ready to get back out there. But Jacques is an experienced cricketer. He might have made a mistake, he might not have. You just have to make sure the same mistakes don't happen twice."
http://content-rsa.cricinfo.com/wc2007/content/current/story/287496.html

While they don't want to comment, it seems as though there's a subtle hint that they do realise he is a problem and they're working on it, and their acknowledgment of his poor strike rate is encouraging. Let's wait and see how Kallis performs tomorrow though.
 
Last edited:
Peterson might be the best we got at local level, but that's still p!ss poor at international level. I would rather have Smith, Gibbs, Prince and whoever can turn an arm bowl in place of peterson.

edit: ta for the stats fiekus
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X