2007 Cricket World Cup (West Indies) thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingrob
  • Start date Start date
Hmmmf... not looking good. Peterson .... all on you

Chinese Cut for 4 please ... i'll take that, how about a wide or a no ball ?
 
8 overs and he can't get a wicket. Then 4 in a one over. (okay actually 2, but you guys know what I mean!) This is real madness.



WE WON!!!! :D
 
I don't watch cricket and it has been a long time since I played but I happened to see the end of tonights game and I want to know how that guy malinga's bowling actions in considered legal? Sorry if this has been covered already.
 
Good bowling .... i still think that action is illegal.

But even chucking, awesome bowling....

Glad we got the points on the board.
 
kiepie said:
Is stump-wicket smashing legal?? :eek:
Click to expand...

Probably more legal than Malinga's bowling action. He's been given an unfair advantage over other bowlers by being allowed to release the ball at a lower trajectory.

AND WHY ON EARTH DID WE NOT CALL FOR A BALL CHANGE AT AROUND THE 45TH OVER!?
 
Highflyer_GP said:
Probably more legal than Malinga's bowling action. He's been given an unfair advantage over other bowlers by being allowed to release the ball at a lower trajectory.

AND WHY ON EARTH DID WE NOT CALL FOR A BALL CHANGE AT AROUND THE 45TH OVER!?
Click to expand...

yeah he has a messed up imo illegal bowling action
 
Last edited:
I'll be the 1st to say again .. whats kemp's role in the team again??I seriously think he needs to bowl. 2ndly petersen in for prince ? uhm he didn't seem to do better to uhm yah.. variation maybe but i think not worth it. I think today he was kinda missed

uhm that last 3 overs were bad.. :eek: if we lost i promised myself not to watch cricket again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X