2007 Cricket World Cup (West Indies) thread

mccrack

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,485
It's in a quote block for a reason.

None the less.

India's Net Run Rate for that match = (191 ÷ 50) - (192 ÷ 48.5) = ( - 0.14 )

vs


In the above match India made 192 off 48.5 overs resulting in a run rate of 3.96

Run rate against them was 191 off 50 overs resulting in a run rate of 3.82

3.96 For
- 3.82 against

You have India at 192 off 48.5
And Bangladesh @ 191 off 50

You worked it out the wrong way ?
 

mccrack

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,485
and just for you Kallis haters out there

Great, i can vouch for that stat, watched that game when it happened.

But that's OUR WHOLE FRACKING argument.

He has all the talent in the world but only imposes himself against Zimbabwe to score a "fastest 50".
 

James

Expert Member
Joined
May 26, 2004
Messages
2,617
It's in a quote block for a reason.

None the less.



vs




You have India at 192 off 48.5
And Bangladesh @ 191 off 50

You worked it out the wrong way ?

Yep my bad ^^ I mis read, I have edited my post.

beer for you too (b)
 

BobbyMac

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
3,353
SL crawling along, making even Kallis' strike rate look good :p

69/1 after 17.3 overs
 

mccrack

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,485
Sri Lankas gonna win the World Cup!!:D

Finally,

Yep, i think SL have the most dangerous attack in this WC with Vaas, Murali & Slinger Malinga. They are definately up there. I would rather face Australia or NZ than face off against SL again.
 

James

Expert Member
Joined
May 26, 2004
Messages
2,617
Kallis said:
"I've been playing a big role in helping South Africa win games and that's the most satisfying aspect," Kallis told a news conference.

"I've never minded criticism but I think there's a line you don't cross and certain people crossed that line. That's fine, I will remember who those guys are in future.

"But that's life, you're up one day and down the next. The only way you can prove people wrong is by putting in performances and winning games for South Africa.

"I've never been too worried about what's been written, I'm not going to change my game just because a few people aren't happy with it. I've been given a role in the side and that's the way I perform."

He has a role to play and he does it well, end of story, some times he may slip but I will put him in my side if we had an NB match to play, no questions asked.
 

hj2k_x

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
32,115
Finally we can put the Kallis/net run rate debate to sleep I hope...

back to the Sri lanka game...
 

JK8

Banned
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
14,105
Finally we can put the Kallis/net run rate debate to sleep I hope...

back to the Sri lanka game...

They a bit slow, Sangakarra must get a 50! Then get to around 180 in the 40th over then accelerate to 280!
 

mccrack

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,485
What we ideally want is AUS to decimate everyone and then loose in the Semi's. That will help our Super 8 cause.
 

hj2k_x

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
32,115
This is true. I wouldn't mind them losing their remaining matches either though ;)
 

sox63

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
8,708
In all my years playing/watching cricket, I have never seen a pitch like that!:eek:
 
Top