But why were they put under that pressure? If SA were 20/3 then it would have been the right move to send in Kallis, but SA were 220/1 with a power play to go. When was the last time Kallis hit over the top at the beginning of his innings?
SA were not just chasing 280 - they were chasing a formidable total that required boundaries in every over or at the very least 2's and 3's instead of singles. Kallis came in and promptly played a Test match. Kallis does not deserve his spot in the team. His bowling is crap (by now he should be able to bowl a mixed bag and put it on the spot).
You need a Kallis in the side for those times when stability is required.
In the modern one day game, stability is much less a requirement than big, clean and quick hitting. Australia have 6 players who can all come out and smash the ball around the park from the word go. And the scary thing is they don't just do it in ODI's and Pro20's - they do this sort of thing in the Tests as well.
If Kallis had tried to play over the top stuff, he would probably have gone out.
Then so be it - he wasted over after over with the number of dot balls he faced. At least if he takes a chance, there's a good chance it'd pay off for him. And if it doesn't, then at least the team still has momentum. Kallis destroyed the momentum - and this was not the first time either.
That may not have been a problem if someone else had stepped up and got a big innings but he should not have been in there in the first place.
Both Smith and De Villiers did their job superbly. They put down a magnificent platform for the boys to build on - in fact, they put South Africa ahead by more than 20 runs for the same stage. There was no pressure when Kallis came in - all he had to do was rotate the strike. But he couldn't even do that - no, he ended up taking a full power play to get going and even once he got going he didn't even take singles that were on offer. Kallis does not possess the brain to be a match winner. He's a plank that boy.
The problem is, first and foremost, there is no flexibility in the side.
I don't think Mickey Arthur has a lot of imagination, and a lot of what;s wrong with the team is squarely at fault with the coach. The fact that Makhaya
still has no slower ball, and still cannot bowl around the wicket is insane. And what's the point of having utility bowlers like Kemp in the side if they're not going to be utilised? As for Polly - at least he wears his heart on his sleeve and never stops trying - the same can certainly not be said for Jacques Kallis. I am amazed at how the media
still make Kallis to be such an awesome cricketer. He's not. The aussies won the game because they're risk takers - and it paid off. South Africa lost that risky fighting spirit years ago - and as long as players like Kallis remain in the side and continue to play for themselves instead of throwing it all in for the team, SA will forever be shown up by Australia.
Hell, Polly has 3 expensive overs so take him off. Cricket is not about going through a step by step plan.
I disagree - Australia has a plan and the scary thing is
everyone knows what Australia's plan is. Australia have always come out with all guns blazing, and the majority of the time it works. They have a game plan, and it's a step-step process. And it works.
Look what happened against India in the C/Town test. Brains trust decided "lets do something different and send in Polly while the ball is hard" and we ended up winning the game. That is what is needed if you want to win games. Look at the situation and adapt.
Exactly - and grow a damned backbone. If your ass is being handed to you, change your tactics.
What happened is that Kallis went in and started building his innings. The pressure that put on the other batsmen to get quick runs got them out. Let me give you an alternate:
1) Put in Polly then Gibbs (if required) for the last power play. Polly gets a quick 40 off 20 balls and the game is almost won. Gibbs comes in and plays a nice sensible 60 off 50 balls........
2) Put in Polly then Gibbs for the last power play. Both go out quickly/cheaply so now you need to rebuild. In goes Kallis and Boucher and start a proper rebuild. Because both players are playing for a big innings, they both end up getting 70-80 off 65 balls. Both would have been careful together and we would have had a fair chance at still winning at the end with wickets in hand.
A coach is there to look at the game situation and adapt not just blindly go where no coach is dumb enough to go. Kallis has a role in the side, just not the role they expected him to play. You don't open the bowling with AB and then say it's all his fault when he gets hit for 25 in the first over.
The bottom line is there's no place for Kallis in the top order. Even when he scores a hundred against lesser sides he still takes less than a run a ball to do it. Kallis is dog slow and not even a great fielder. So he doesn't even make up for his lack of tempo by saving countless runs in the field.