2016 Renault Megane (4th Generation)

^ I wish that most of the temperature controls weren't in there, and had actual physical buttons.

But other than that it's brilliant, very responsive and works pretty much the way a tablet would - with swipe gestures, customisable home screens, pinch to zoom etc.
 
Nah. Many models no longer offer 3 door options. Clio, Astra, Meg, new A1, next gen A3 etc

3-door models don't pull in the sales (worldwide) like they used to so manufactures are simplifying the body styles.

Ah, I see. Always liked the option of a 3 door.
 
I just hope to see some change in Renault sales, pity these two won't make it to there. It would be a 200% increase in sales.
 
So I was doing some GPS-recorded tests late on Saturday evening.

Using launch control, I was able to consistently get a time of 7.2 - 7.3 seconds for 0-100, which is very close to the claimed time of 7.1. Could probably put the difference down to altitude.

But what's surprising is that when I launched the car myself from idle, I was getting 6.5 - 6.6 seconds consistently! This propagates to the 1/4 mile time too, being about 0.6 - 0.7 seconds faster than using launch control.


8eae04adab97fe2e38a1ddf4f20a0f10.jpg



It's a proper sleeper!
 
So I was doing some GPS-recorded tests late on Saturday evening.

Using launch control, I was able to consistently get a time of 7.2 - 7.3 seconds for 0-100, which is very close to the claimed time of 7.1. Could probably put the difference down to altitude.

But what's surprising is that when I launched the car myself from idle, I was getting 6.5 - 6.6 seconds consistently! This propagates to the 1/4 mile time too, being about 0.6 - 0.7 seconds faster than using launch control.


8eae04adab97fe2e38a1ddf4f20a0f10.jpg



It's a proper sleeper!

Very impressive for a 151kw "warm hatch". It's not the full fat Renaultsport experience, not build in the factory in Dieppe, but those times are pretty darn impressive.

https://group.renault.com/en/our-company/locations/our-industrial-locations/dieppe-plant-2/
 
So I was doing some GPS-recorded tests late on Saturday evening.

Using launch control, I was able to consistently get a time of 7.2 - 7.3 seconds for 0-100, which is very close to the claimed time of 7.1. Could probably put the difference down to altitude.

But what's surprising is that when I launched the car myself from idle, I was getting 6.5 - 6.6 seconds consistently! This propagates to the 1/4 mile time too, being about 0.6 - 0.7 seconds faster than using launch control.


8eae04adab97fe2e38a1ddf4f20a0f10.jpg



It's a proper sleeper!

Excellent times! I should try idle launch in my clio. if the tires are warm it launches hard and does 6.4... if itsnt, it spins and get 6.8.
 
So I was doing some GPS-recorded tests late on Saturday evening.

Using launch control, I was able to consistently get a time of 7.2 - 7.3 seconds for 0-100, which is very close to the claimed time of 7.1. Could probably put the difference down to altitude.

But what's surprising is that when I launched the car myself from idle, I was getting 6.5 - 6.6 seconds consistently! This propagates to the 1/4 mile time too, being about 0.6 - 0.7 seconds faster than using launch control.


8eae04adab97fe2e38a1ddf4f20a0f10.jpg



It's a proper sleeper!

Wow nice! I haven't even tried launch control yet. Must find some place to try it out this weekend. :D
 
I saw someone post the moose test for the Sandero Stepway so I wondered how the Megane would fare. And wow it does really well!

[video=youtube;FrjeMmiwJWw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrjeMmiwJWw[/video]
 
Yay, my baby is now in the garage. Fixed the driveway so that the car can get in. Previously I drove an SUV and then a crossover so never noticed the steep slope into the garage.

I'm loving the car and can definitely recommend it.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X