Azbubu
Honorary Master
What does Will Smith have to say about this? The learning channel one not the one from Bel Air.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
No, precedence only applies to what's inside of the brackets, not the outside. 48/2(9+3) will thus be seen as 48/2(12) but there is still a * between the 2*(12) so we can rewrite it as 48/2*12 which is not the same as 48/(2(12)).
and even after asking after the above, HOW CAN ANYONE NOT SEE THAT 2(9+3) is one term.
IT IS ONE TERM
ONE TERM
LEARN YOUR MATHS PEOPLE!!!!!
THERE ARE NO BRACKETS BETWEEN (48/2). NONE
actually the entire thing is one term, terms are only separated by + and -
hence voorkeur van bewerking (BODMAS?)
1. Brackets/ Hakkies
2. exponentials and roots/ magsverheffing en worteltrekking
3.deel/ divide
4. maal/multiply
5.add and subtract...
etc! see that divide is before multiply,
here is some clarification on the ambiguity that can occur via the notation,
![]()
sorry what?
6÷2 are two terms
x/y are two terms
we may have been talking at cross purposes.
but your statement helps my point.
in what he are provided, we need to know what is the numerator and what is the denominator. hence why in an earlier post i linked to riddlenut.
as written i would read this from left to right (and not add any further brackets)
48 (numerator) divided by a denominator which happens to be 2(9+3)
2(9+3) is one number.
You may want to add a bracket around 48/2. But there is no bracket there. You are changing what is in front of you. there is no bracket.
it depends on the notation, if you use '/' sign then yes I agree the answer is 2 hence it will only make sense if you compare it with the written notation.
if you use the divide sign then the answer is 228
48÷2 (9+3) = 228, 48÷2 (9+3) is one term,
because the entire thing is a term you cannot treat 48 and 2(9+30) as separate terms which is what you are trying to do. The BIDMAS is also applicable within the terms, and division comes before multiplication.
48
-------------
2(9+3)
answer please?
2 however that is not equal to
48÷2 (9+3)
why are you adding brackets to (2(9+3))?
why are you adding brackets to (48/2)?
when in fact 2(9+3) seems the more likely term that reuires brackets?
i hwas always taught that when a number is next to a bracket without a mathematical sign, that number is applied with the the bracket. where you taught different?
2 however that is not equal to
48÷2 (9+3)
=48÷2 (12)
=24 (12)
228
why are you adding brackets to (2(9+3))?
division comes before multiplication hence
48(9+3)÷2
= 48(6)
=228
would you agree?
surely xyz = zxy ?
yup, taught to use division first. and that the bracket just means multiplication.