blunomore
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2007
- Messages
- 26,789
i knew the life expectancy of a main-lining heroin addict was about 2 years ...
What does this mean ?
i knew the life expectancy of a main-lining heroin addict was about 2 years ...
I get bouts of depression and mania from time to time..but I'm on Lithium, which is a mood stabilizer and keeps the episodes mild and managable.
I've also had loads of therapy and have learned to read the signs and can stop an episode before it gets hectic...Not easy...But the Lithium has enabled me to live a normal life.
What does this mean ?
To inject (a drug, such as heroin) directly into a major vein.
For a quicker high, I presume ?
Injecting into the vein...What does this mean ?
Always been Bipolar...The Bipolar caused me to make bad decisions and end up on heroin (which strangely enough kept my Bipolar under control - isn't that ironic).
It has been proven that some people are born with a genetic defect that makes them more open to becoming addicts...Something to do with chemical imbalance in the brain and dopamine production and hormone proteins (can't really remember)...But some people are born with what is mistakenly called "an addictive personality"....The scariest thing is that its hereditary!!!
Do you think that drug addicts think they're better than non users ... ?
I've always got the impression that, 'I do X, Y and Z ... I'm cool and better than you are ...'
Just curious.
I found the same thing...All the addicts I've known have either been highly intellegent or gifted in other ways such as music and art....
Addicts are often seen as weak, morally deficient, useless and ethically corrupt by non-users.
This is especially true for heroin addicts, I haven't found this to be the case with all drugs though.
Really? I find that a bit of a generalisation, to be honest. SOME of them may be gifted - the Amy Winehouses and Kurt Cobains of the world, but not necessarily intelligent - to me those are two different things.
On the contrary, I think mostly it's non-users who think they are better than addicts. Addicts are often seen as weak, morally deficient, useless and ethically corrupt by non-users.
Don't know if BipolarDude is still on the board at the moment, but I am curious: you read about the actors and rock stars being addicted to heroin or other substances - how do they function then? How do keep on making movies or doing concerts or recording?
What is a 'functional' heroin user?
Thanks
Its when the individual begins to link the creative side with the substance in question.
The individual believes that what is created, music, art etc comes from the use of the substance, and without the substance that creativity ceases to exist within them.
Therefore they begin to believe they require the substance for creative purposes.
Don't know if BipolarDude is still on the board at the moment, but I am curious: you read about the actors and rock stars being addicted to heroin or other substances - how do they function then? How do keep on making movies or doing concerts or recording?
What is a 'functional' heroin user?
Thanks
A functional heroin user is one who is able to function in day to day life. They have a job that they do well, they raise a family and function in society just like everyone else. As long as they are able to maintain their habit they can function. If they can't get heroin they will fall apart though, just like any other addict. I have a friend in Sweden who was engaged to a man, a well known and well liked successful doctor. He died from a heroin overdose. She was not even aware he was using heroin and had been for 8 years. He functioned normally, had access to a steady supply, was successful in work, etc...
A functional heroin user is one who is able to function in day to day life. They have a job that they do well, they raise a family and function in society just like everyone else. As long as they are able to maintain their habit they can function. If they can't get heroin they will fall apart though, just like any other addict. I have a friend in Sweden who was engaged to a man, a well known and well liked successful doctor. He died from a heroin overdose. She was not even aware he was using heroin and had been for 8 years. He functioned normally, had access to a steady supply, was successful in work, etc...
The Swiss government is selling heroin to hard-core drug users. But in doing so the government isn't offhandedly facilitating drug abuse: it's conducting a national scientific experiment to determine whether prescribing heroin, morphine, and injectable methadone will save Switzerland both money and misery by reducing crime, disease, and death.
I was under the impression that, because it is addictive, you need more and more to reach the same effect and that eventually, you cannot function in society anymore ......... ?
This is especially true for heroin addicts, I haven't found this to be the case with all drugs though.