DigitalSoldier
Honorary Master
Which Law says black people should be chosen over white people? Perhaps it can be challenged with Human Rights Commission if its unfair and unjust!
Well is that not what AA basically says ?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Which Law says black people should be chosen over white people? Perhaps it can be challenged with Human Rights Commission if its unfair and unjust!
Well is that not what AA basically says ?
No, its not. Its your interpretation.
No, its not. Its your interpretation.
This policy will be applied to all who have been disadvantaged by apartheid and, as ANC President Nelson Mandela reiterated at Retreat recently, applies to Coloured people as much as any other affected group.
According to government, whites had not been disadvantaged, so whites will not be considered for AA positions.
Well, that seems to tie statistically with the situation SA is in as far as inequalities are concerned. Perhaps inequalities exist because "whites had not been disadvantaged".
Lets give those who were disadvantaged (the vast majority of SA population) a chance too. Obviously, a few will not be happy with that but diversity will hopefully benefit everyone in the long run.
Source: http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/pr/1994/pr0309.html
According to government, whites had not been disadvantaged, so whites will not be considered for AA positions.
I take it you live in Canada and therefore are not farmiliar with our version of AA.My question, if you look at SA and Canada side by side with roughly the same population, is this: How are the minorities, including the whites, chinese, koreans, Indians, Coloureds and others in South Africa protected under AA?
As you can see the designated groups in SA (unlike Canada) are not necessarily minorities amongst the population at large. But due to apartheid they are very much minorities in the workplace especially in skilled level positions.Designated employers and designated groups. Designated employers are those who employ 50 or more staff members or whose annual turnover is more than that set down in Schedule 4 of the Act (the figures vary according to the type of industry). The National Defence Force, National Intelligence Agency and South African Secret Service are excluded. Designated groups are blacks (Africans, Coloureds and Indians), women and people with disabilities.
Employers must draw up an employment equity plan, setting out the steps they intend taking to achieve employment equity, over the next one to five years. To do this, they need to analyse their workforce profile as well as their employment practices and policies. In drawing up the plan they must consult with unions and employees to get consensus around it. Employers need to report their equity plans regularly to the Department of Labour, which then monitors implementation
I take it you live in Canada and therefore are not farmiliar with our version of AA.
Here goes
Who is affected ?
As you can see the designated groups in SA (unlike Canada) are not necessarily minorities amongst the population at large. But due to apartheid they are very much minorities in the workplace especially in skilled level positions.
How can employment equity be achieved ?
The way it works is like Canadian AA reversed. So anybody with a pale skin are like the Québécois but are lowest in the pecking order for jobs in the private sector, government contracts, government training schemes, trainees in government sponsored institutions, civil service, bursaries, free/subsidised housing, and even special share deals etc.Since AA is applied in other countries to provide employment equity to minorities, how is the white minority provided with employment equity in SA?
Surely a country like SA needs to protect it's minorities including the white minority?
Minorities are not protected. In fact they have become the whipping boys for all the problems in the country.
Hahaha, JK8, I can tell you are enjoying this. I'll be keen to see how you feel in 10 years time, when South Africa has degraded to just another African country. Do yourself a favour and go and visit a couple of African countries - SA is marvelous compared to ANY of the other African countries – for now. And, unfortunately, SA WILL go down the same road. So, yes, go ahead, support your new form of apartheid, and see where the country ends up.
I have started my application to move to Auz, because of ppl with your type of mentality. And, I am afraid that you are too simple minded to realize the implications of the mass exodus happening right now.
Do you really and honestly think that somehow, South Africa will not fall into that same hole?
I disagree Fully. IT ALREADY DEGRADED beyond redeem. We are on borrowed time and freebie money. Donors fatigue is setting in. We will be worse than ZIM SOONer than later. AND JK8 Knows it! His just stuck with his foolish and feeble comrade mentality attitude due to the "links" to the struggle, Yeah "struggle" as they do still now after a decade! Just cannot rule, like the rest of Africa. First IDI Amin, Now Mugabe...Next ZUMA? or just still Mbeki. No he will hide behind his 90 Mill walls, laughing at the populace.
AA is an idiotic solution that flouts basic economics in favour of political popularism.
If the govt really wanted to sort out the imbalances, they should have been pouring every available cent into subsidised schooling, trade colleges, universities and all other forms of education.
The historical legacy between the previously disadvantaged and the previously advantaged comes down to two major things:
- lack of the means to acquire education
- lack of the means to support one's family
I'm sure that there are hard core apartheid employers that would never have hired blacks, however thats what the CCMA is for.
The fundamental issue with AA is that it assumes there are enough experienced, skilled blacks to fill all the gaps the quotas require. The hard truth is that there isn't.
In enacting the AA laws, they've driven out a large number of highly skilled, intelligent people that realised there are other places in the world that actually appreciate what they can add to the economy. So skills transfer has become even harder.
On top of that lot, many of the very people that have left are the sorts of people that start new enterprises which create jobs and wealth. But seeing a vastly superior option elsewhere, such people have left, taking their financial, intellectual and human capital with them.
To me, if the government had spent 12 years focusing on educating the next generation rather than formalising reverse apartheid, the lights would stay on in Cape Town.
Instead, a new generation has grown up with the same polarised reality of racial segregation - just with a different name.
Let me break it down, AA is not unfair because in the LONG run South Africa will benefit from a skilled middle class who are dedicated to this country.
Which Law says black people should be chosen over white people? Perhaps it can be challenged with Human Rights Commission if its unfair and unjust!
Equality
9. (1) Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law.
(2) Equality includes the full and equal enjoyment of all rights and freedoms. To promote the achievement of equality, legislative and other measures designed to protect or advance persons, or categories of persons, disadvantaged by unfair discrimination may be taken.
(3) The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.
(4) No person may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds in terms of subsection (3). National legislation must be enacted to prevent or prohibit unfair discrimination.
(5) Discrimination on one or more of the grounds listed in subsection (3) is unfair unless it is established that the discrimination is fair.
http://www.polity.org.za/html/govdocs/constitution/saconst02.html?rebookmark=1#9
Limitation of rights
36. (1) The rights in the Bill of Rights may be limited only in terms of law of general application to the extent that the limitation is reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom, taking into account all relevant factors, including *
1. the nature of the right;
2. the importance of the purpose of the limitation;
3. the nature and extent of the limitation;
4. the relation between the limitation and its purpose; and
5. less restrictive means to achieve the purpose.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (1) or in any other provision of the Constitution, no law may limit any right entrenched in the Bill of Rights.
So fix the past 400 years with another 400 years of the same (just with the races reversed)...yeah that's bright.brixton tower said:Basically white people have had job reservation for 400 years and for about 40 odd years it was formalised into law.
lol, you must have quite an inferiority complex to utter that...especially since I've never hinted at anything of the sort.brixton tower said:The white folk in South Africa were not born with skills or some sort of God-given intellect that made them superior.
The governments mentioned are importing skills...not white skills as you mentioned. All of these governments rightly realise that the important factor is whether the people coming in can do the job or not...they could care less about your skin colour or background. Unfortunately the SA government doesn't have the same attitude...it seems that in SA a poorly skilled black person has more value than a highly skilled white/indian/coloured person...and thus the mass exodus of skills will continue.brixton tower said:The apartheid government imported white skills (remember the white influx from a depressed post WW2 Europe?) in pretty much the same way Oz, ENZED and the UK governments are doing right now.
Substantiation?brixton tower said:Let me break it down, AA is not unfair because in the LONG run South Africa will benefit from a skilled middle class who are dedicated to this country.
Oh man, you really like the strong stuff. Nice use of the favorite "racist" line - I never saw that comingbrixton tower said:And please, don't blame the power blackouts on AA...that's a nice piece of propaganda used by the racists that just won't wash...you and every intelligent being knows why we had power blackouts- a fast growing economy without provision being made for new energy demands.