Roo!
Expert Member
Roo, your signature says it all
Some are just more Equal than others
Exactly!!!
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Roo, your signature says it all
Some are just more Equal than others
and what is the best way to get them level ?
by appointing people with their skin colour as only criterium ?
i've always wondererd what happens to a person that for instance has a black grandparent...will he be advantaged by AA or not ?
where does one draw the line ?
It's amazing how the majority believe that to level the playing field you have to hold the others back. How about standing up and making things better for yourselves? How about rising the playing field instead of dropping it? Why is it that in order to have things better for one group another must suffer? Surely that is what a global village is about, equal opportunities for all?
What? Accept it could be worse? How is it acceptable to move from a situation where certain groups were treated as second class citizens to a situation where a different group are now treated that way?
I think you need to start with getting the teams right, equal, let the skills develop then start raising the bar!!
The other group is not suffering as you put it, its a little molehill they have to encounter now and again, chances are if they good enough they will find something!
They fall under coloured I think. The skin colour is not the only criteria!! You missing the point!! If 2 candidates have simalar qualifications both from different races, the former oppressed person will get the job.
It will only stop when the playing fields are level!
Once again I am led to believe that we are living in different countries, tell me which group is being treated as a second class citizen, and how ?
There is nothing wrong with affirmative action. There is a problem with quotas. Given two equal candidates, one a white male, another who is not, I will hire the one who is not a white male. White men had all the best jobs to themselves, everywhere, not just in South Africa. I only object to being forced to hire someone less qualified to fill a quota.
It was not thrown their way. It was loaned and those loans came with strings attached. Those were requirements that they cripple their economies and any chance of competing against the people who loaned them the money.CREATE prosperous societies even after $580 billion is thrown their way
The skin colour is not the only criteria!! You missing the point!! If 2 candidates have simalar qualifications both from different races, the former oppressed person will get the job.
hmmm...similar qual, better qual, whateva.
what most folks are complaining about BEE/AA, as it is implimented, is that the skills don't matter... doesnt matta if the other dude's got similar or better (or even any) skills, the job is only available to the 'former oppressed person' the other dude isnt even elligible for the job....
In many cases a skilled worker, with many years experience in his job, is just replaced by an AA character, how does this new guy have anywhere close to same level of skills?
Pretty soon we're gonna have workers who were born after '94, and can't really claim to be "former oppressed" .... how long are we gonna ride that excuse?
and if the white guy comes from a poor PTA West family and the black guy from a rich black family (eg. one that can afford R4 mil of jewelry) what will be the case ?
oh ja, and it's 'similar'
It was not thrown their way. It was loaned and those loans came with strings attached. Those were requirements that they cripple their economies and any chance of competing against the people who loaned them the money.
I often have two or even three people that are so close I have to make a judgement call. Somebody has to be disappointed. Why should I favour a white male? Back when I started working there would have been no point in a black man applying for the same job, even if he were better qualified. And a woman, forget it.Aside from whether this is right or wrong, realistically you're never going to get 2 candidates that are exactly equal, someone will always be at least marginally better, whatever colour or gender they are. Why should young white males be penalised for what happened historically anyway?
There is nothing wrong with affirmative action. There is a problem with quotas. Given two equal candidates, one a white male, another who is not, I will hire the one who is not a white male. White men had all the best jobs to themselves, everywhere, not just in South Africa. I only object to being forced to hire someone less qualified to fill a quota.
That is a truly stupid argument.Loans are optional - no one can force you to take a loan.
Blaming everything on the IMF and World Bank is a pathetic excuse - if you don't like the strings or don't agree with their policies then you don't take the loan.
Pretty soon we're gonna have workers who were born after '94, and can't really claim to be "former oppressed" .... how long are we gonna ride that excuse?
The irony is that the ANC has to use old Apartheid racial classification methods to find out who to empower. If you were in the struggle movement, you automatically qualify.and what is the best way to get them level ?
by appointing people with their skin colour as only criterium ?
i've always wondererd what happens to a person that for instance has a black grandparent...will he be advantaged by AA or not ?
where does one draw the line ?
they are 13 now...so 6 years before they enter the job market...
ag but the ANC will still blame it on apartheid...because their parents "suffered" under apartheid and all that...
they aren't going to let go of their perfect scapegoat for everyting