Beri
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2006
- Messages
- 4,347
- Reaction score
- 68
That's much better. Any other improvements though?
No. Ah reset my port and it worked great for 1 day. Now it is slow again
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
That's much better. Any other improvements though?
No. Ah reset my port and it worked great for 1 day. Now it is slow again
Well at least we improved your latency :/
Looks like a line fault to meThat ping is a bit high :/
Please would you run my second tool in my sig - and post the results here
Z
Ping results for last hop before account switches to ISP's hardware (Hop 2 on Tracert)
Pinging 105.236.5.193 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=492ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=569ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=478ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=408ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=483ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=567ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=491ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=370ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=484ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=532ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=571ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=457ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=349ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=483ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=447ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=481ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=518ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=571ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=445ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=352ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=440ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=518ms TTL=254
Request timed out.
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=564ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=505ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=475ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=547ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=565ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=522ms TTL=254
Reply from 105.236.5.193: bytes=32 time=496ms TTL=254
Ping statistics for 105.236.5.193:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 29, Lost = 1 (3% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 349ms, Maximum = 571ms, Average = 488ms
2014/06/16 23:41:22.92
Is this for REAL ??
Wanted to upgrade from 300 gb capped to uncapped 40 mb.
@afriman think you have a issue on your site.
6.93TB for R52.93 sounds like a bargain to me, what are you complaining about?![]()
![]()
6.93TB for R52.93 sounds like a bargain to me, what are you complaining about?![]()
![]()
You can actually have the internet if you use that much data![]()
Just don't wanna get charged more if it's a mistake.
Also would like to let them know if it's a potential issue on the website.
R52 just seems very low.
Hehe, I'm almost there... after a year!
![]()
Hey Everyone
Saw a few posts about throughput being poor and latency. I think it seems to be the same few people having this routing issue. I can't see from the posts whether they are still getting the same results. Timeout on second hop suggests it might be. Please drop me a PM so I can continue trying to get this figured out.
Otherwise we haven't been seeing much different on the network in general. Changes were made in the North over the last day or so, so I am hoping the packet loss being reported should now have disappeared. If not, please let me know ASAP.
this morning I still had the time out.
Gaming ping is a tad high again :/ any news on the south IPC upgrades?