drukkie
Expert Member
I cancelled....sorry afriman....
now to find a new buddy.
now to find a new buddy.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I do understand, but I am currently working from home and this involves downloading a lot of apps that we use in the office. And I am not able to do this. Really frustrating.
This is what I'm trying to establish.So if network demand doesn't go down, or broadband heaven forbid demand increases, then the afrihost experience will be less broadband more dialup?
One couldn't, really. Browsing still works well, as does streaming. Doing either on a heavily throttled line...Sho, could one not say that continuous heavy shaping (down to 6%!) is not the equivalent of throttling??
Yah I've got to say that at those speeds dial up internet is starting to look appealing lol...
Best possible service is NOT 3 hours for a 128 meg file no matter how you look at it.
Hmmmm, here I was considering moving from Mweb to Afrihost (4mb) yet I see a lot of people are struggling now? Is there a decent ISP option anywhere?
All I need are reasonable torrent speeds (I auto-limit to 90kBs anyway) and solid gaming latency.
Again, we could adopt the throttling approach - which many people are still raging about on other ISPs. But if your entire DSL is throttled down to 256kbps indefinitely, or for 30 days - I don't think anyone would be happy with that.
Fact is, there is a heavy demand, with that being said, I think having decent real time service while we wait for the demand to subside is the best win for everyone![]()
So if network demand doesn't go down, or broadband heaven forbid demand increases, then the afrihost experience will be less broadband more dialup? Sho, could one not say that continuous heavy shaping (down to 6%!) is not the equivalent of throttling??
I just do not understand how the demand can be so much higher this last week....
I really, really don't want to keep raging at you and your colleagues, but if you were to read back a couple of (dozen) pages you'll see I was one of the Afrihost clients defending the (logical and obvious) need for traffic management in a previous conversation in this thread. I'm not denying the necessity, nor would I have doubted the fairness of your system until last week. It still feels as if you don't get that my frustration arises from the dramatic difference in service quality we've seen.
If I think back to the few times I saw my connection shaped according to ClientZone in the past months, I can recall seeing P2P being shaped to somewhere in the 60% range every once in a while. Currently it's shaped to 6%. Usage trends, over a subscriber base several thousand strong (I'm sure), just should not shift fast enough - overnight! - to necessitate a further 90% reduction of already reduced throughput. Again, I'm not huge on torrents, but I do remember the numbers... I also remember 'No shaping applied' proclaimed for HTTP right alongside the P2P figure.
I'm just trying to understand the shift... Is that other ISP to blame, having chased all their monster users to you with their... erm... shift in policy?Unlikely, because one would expect THAT influx to coincide with the start of a new month...
Last week was really bad in terms of the Apple updates, along with GTA5. It's still continuing since not everyone grabbed it then, although the demand is slowly getting back to normal.
We obviously do want the best experience for our clients so we're monitoring closely and making any improvements where we can.
For sure. I've had a few annoying times over the past week but overall I've been pretty impressed.
Seeing as how my usage isn't that high and for work I can benefit from having unshaped, I will be switching to your capped solution, but I'm really impressed by the mostly lack of shaping on your uncapped accounts.