Afriman, thank you for that insight. The level of preparedness for an ISP moving partners is truly shocking. At least your management team owned up to the internal network operators and capacity shortcomings and is getting in the requisite expertise. That should have happened a long time back and if Gian and his team have any integrity they should apologise to all affected users.
It is not fair to apportion blame to Telkom's IPC provisioning as delays in that must be a known factor in the ISP industry and points to planning issues. I would guess that the move to MTN's network may have been too early?
I haven't tested much as I don't have the time to monitor an ISP's service for them, but at the moment they are seemingly using straight throttling. Whether it's usage based or otherwise is not yet sure, perhaps Afriman could elaborate on the technical measured currently in place and how they are being transitioned to a shaped QoS service?
@new_in_za2 : agreed on the L7 routing complexity. I shape my internal traffic (Mikrotik PCQ trees) so I am familiar with the concepts but L7 is a different beast. I have disabled all port based shaping on my internal network due to the havoc that the wildly varying throughput on the network causes. It's awesome though to prioritize traffic with L7 and shape down low priority traffic in favour of my Wife's YouTube.
It's awesome to see how user's activities are split evenly. When my wife and I stream YouTube I can see other traffic split the demand 2,3,4 ways fairly.
It is not fair to apportion blame to Telkom's IPC provisioning as delays in that must be a known factor in the ISP industry and points to planning issues. I would guess that the move to MTN's network may have been too early?
I haven't tested much as I don't have the time to monitor an ISP's service for them, but at the moment they are seemingly using straight throttling. Whether it's usage based or otherwise is not yet sure, perhaps Afriman could elaborate on the technical measured currently in place and how they are being transitioned to a shaped QoS service?
@new_in_za2 : agreed on the L7 routing complexity. I shape my internal traffic (Mikrotik PCQ trees) so I am familiar with the concepts but L7 is a different beast. I have disabled all port based shaping on my internal network due to the havoc that the wildly varying throughput on the network causes. It's awesome though to prioritize traffic with L7 and shape down low priority traffic in favour of my Wife's YouTube.
It's awesome to see how user's activities are split evenly. When my wife and I stream YouTube I can see other traffic split the demand 2,3,4 ways fairly.
