LazyLion
King of de Jungle
I knew there was reason I preferred ATI, besides the price! 
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Well, Nvidia has always just been more popular then ATI because Nvidia always made their cards just a little faster then ATI's, and by now, people have it in their heads that Nvidia is only graphics card for them. ATI have always been a little more innovative with Video play back, and other features that are very nice, but won't really swing a buyers money that way.
However, with AMD ruling the roost, ATI has taken a rather different approach. They have retained all the nice features they had before, and added a few extra, but they really have focused in on refining the performance of the graphics card and making it more for gaming, with ncie little features that just make owning an ATI more worth while. Unlike Nvidia, ATI does most (if not all) of those features such as video encoding, and what not all for free because, well, that's what makes a company seem like they care.
Nvidia has always been more of an advertiser, they market their product like Intel does. So they are more popular. However, I can't see them going to get back the market share that they have been losing ever since they took a chunk out of ATI's in 2006 (the 8800series). Ati has been slowly, been taking more and more market share from Nvidia in the past few quarters. With no sight of an Nvidia gt300 card coming out before christmas, and with the gt 240 looking like a pretty shyte card (ATI will make sure Nvidia can't compete with them with the gt 240), I think more people are going to bring home an ATI this year then a Nvidia.
Nvidia might be very close to what ATI did with the 2000 series.
The thing is, most people go to sites like THG and notice that Nvidia cards are usually ahead by 5fps at ridiculous resolutions. Though, I found that ATI have much better image quality, is better priced and at normal resolutions gives Nvidia a run for its money.
The thing is, most people go to sites like THG and notice that Nvidia cards are usually ahead by 5fps at ridiculous resolutions. Though, I found that ATI have much better image quality, is better priced and at normal resolutions gives Nvidia a run for its money.
Those re results make me wonder.....I haven't seen the 5870 beat the GTX 295 in any other review nearly that often and definitely not by such a large margin:erm:
Zenbaas, you are comparing a GTX 295 dual-gpu against a single 5870 gpu
you trying to compare apples against bananas
your comparisons is unfair
![]()
THAT review showed the 5870 constantly beating the GTX295 by quite a large margin....almost all other reviews shows the GTX295 ahead most of the time..understand now...?![]()