I just said Telkom, and that the issues are not the same.
So you missed the issue, this is legality, the same would have happened to Apple if they did the same thing.
Please explain how Telkom, who didn’t make the device, the OS or the app is responsible?
There’s no legality BS. Someone bought the device and they also paid for Netflix,
explain how this isn’t a dev support issue when Netflix is supported on the exact same hardware without the Telkom brand.
Telkom also sells Apple hardware btw, but like I said carriers don’t bully Apple. You won’t find an iPhone booting up with the Vodafone logo.
I said Windows does not support integration getting OTP from e-mail, not that it doesn't allow you to do WebAuthn. You brought WebAuthn into it, it's not, it replaces your e-mail accounts etc.
You just pointed out why OTPs are useless.
If a service can do 2FA with an OTP, it can easily do WebAuthn.
Windows Hello does not require a MSA account, I doubt you’d prove otherwise.
The certificate is on the device, you need another device to auth a new device. You can't just log onto a new device and have it working, you'd need access to any of your old devices as well. So how is this more advantageous than just tying everything to log in with Google?
Again you’re proving why OTPs are useless. I don’t know why you want integrations for pointless things or additional steps where it’s not needed.
You either are using a trusted device or have a key.
SSH from anywhere,
A helper for OpenSSH to interact with FIDO2 and U2F security keys through native Windows Hello API - tavrez/openssh-sk-winhello
github.com
Oh look, Windows Hello APIs.
You're arguing something completely different to what my statements are, Swa seems to have rubbed off on you based on how you argue.
I’m not, I said WebAuthn is a thing.
OTPs are useless I said it, you proved it.
Some wouldn’t even consider it a factor in MFA.
This is like how you didn’t want to accept Apple Pay works offline so you started making nonsense up, about tokens and crap.