Another race attack at top university

Fudzy said:
So what did happen?
Click to expand...

Sounds to me like there was a small incident that were blown out of proportion by the "victim" who seems to have a axe to grind with whiteys. I like the way he explained he walked on the pavement and the car came [-]speeding[/-]flying past with the driver intent to murder him. On the pavement?

Strange tho from his twitter page I pick up nothing extraordinary. Maybe he was just gunning for a extra pay cheque?
 
Last edited:
The court heard Gwebu questioned a medical report because a white doctor was involved. Nel asked him why did he not get a second medical opinion.

Gwebu answered that he had done so. He had phoned a politician.
Click to expand...

.

Case dismissed :D
 
Have they suspended the wolf crier yet, pending investigation.

i mean is it not a serious offence to wrongly accuse people of stuff?
 
Why is there no counter against the Gwebu? Surely he should be up there facing charges of discrimination, wasting courts time and slander? Has the University suspended him?
 
Lupus said:
Why is there no counter against the Gwebu? Surely he should be up there facing charges of discrimination, wasting courts time and slander? Has the University suspended him?
Click to expand...

Problem idiots like Gwebu and Malema, and there is many many of them, have the majority of the country behind them and it fuels the hate which the ANC wants to retain so they can fall back on it whenever it suits them for political gain.
 
Sneeky said:
Have they suspended the wolf crier yet, pending investigation.

i mean is it not a serious offence to wrongly accuse people of stuff?
Click to expand...

Depends on whether or not they really assaulted the guy, the lawyers were clever to poke holes through his racism claims and ignore the fact that he was beaten.
 
Sneeky said:
Have they suspended the wolf crier yet, pending investigation.

i mean is it not a serious offence to wrongly accuse people of stuff?
Click to expand...

Depends on whether or not they really assaulted the guy, the lawyers were clever to poke holes through his racism claims and ignore the fact that he was beaten.
 
Are you telling me he lost with the race card?

Guess he should of used the joker card...
 
Wasabee! said:
Are you telling me he lost with the race card?

Guess he should of used the joker card...
Click to expand...
He lost because his statement couldn't be verified and his affidavit differed from his testimony. Easiest way to lose a case against even low budget lawyers.
 
This is why people should be assumed innocent till proven guilty. Something us South Africans have forgotten.
 
The legal advisers for Jansen missed the boat completely, unless of course the University is still as racist as I know it to be and they tried to protect alleged racists. (I'm an alumni). The University should have instituted it's own disciplinary hearing against the students after they suspended them, regardless of the fact that there was a criminal case in the process. The fact that these gentlemen were found not guilty in a criminal case doesn't mean they were not going to be found guilty in a disciplinary hearing since the test is different between the criminal and disciplinary hearing proceedings. The fact that they didn't institute a disciplinary hearing has subjected them to a civil suit as they didn't follow a correct procedure, i.e suspension without an intention to hold a disciplinar hearing. But this doesn't mean the gentlemen will win the law suit on substantive matters in a civil court as the test to determine their guilt would be different from the one that was applied in the criminal case, but they have a good chance of getting something since Jansen kicked them out of the University without a disciplinary hearing.
 
rza said:
The legal advisers for Jansen missed the boat completely, unless of course the University is still as racist as I know it to be and they tried to protect alleged racists. (I'm an alumni). The University should have instituted it's own disciplinary hearing against the students after they suspended them, regardless of the fact that there was a criminal case in the process. The fact that these gentlemen were found not guilty in a criminal case doesn't mean they were not going to be found guilty in a disciplinary hearing since the test is different between the criminal and disciplinary hearing proceedings. The fact that they didn't institute a disciplinary hearing has subjected them to a civil suit as they didn't follow a correct procedure, i.e suspension without an intention to hold a disciplinar hearing. But this doesn't mean the gentlemen will win the law suit on substantive matters in a civil court as the test to determine their guilt would be different from the one that was applied in the criminal case, but they have a good chance of getting something since Jansen kicked them out of the University without a disciplinary hearing.
Click to expand...

Innocent till proven guilty. The University have no authority to suspend these students based on assumption claims. The court has found them innocent and the University assumed them guilty from the start. Even if the University found them guilty internally and they won the court case the University would have been held accountable.
 
Fudzy said:
Depends on whether or not they really assaulted the guy, the lawyers were clever to poke holes through his racism claims and ignore the fact that he was beaten.
Click to expand...

NO! BS. There was also inconsistencies between the injury reports, "due to a white doctor" according to Gwebu, and off witness statements of what really transpired. Can you even read? This "victim" was an outright liar from the onset of this case and as usual every idiot with hangups about racism jumped the gun and blamed as well as criminalised the whiteys, like you are trying to play it here.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X