Anti-CNN website launched

Nothin constructive to say again?

Well when discuss something sensible then yeah I'll have something constructive to say. Claiming CNN is balanced is dodgy enough but to claim they're Pro U.S is '9/11 inside job', 'fake moon landings' and Rosswell aliens' loony :o
 
Last edited:
Maybe you should loosen your tincap a little, because it seems you're too blind to comprehend how a US based news network can be biased in favour of the country its been hosted in. The people that own these news networks are very very wealthy and they are american. And with that wealth comes considerable power in high places. And being american they will air only what suits their agendas regardless of whether it is fair and unbiased.

alanf85: Well when you discussing something sensible then yeah I'll have something constructive to say. Claiming CNN is balanced is dodgy enough but to claim they're Pro U.S is '9/11 inside job', 'fake moon landings' and Rosswell aliens' loony

Well like you've jus said, claiming that CNN is balanced, is dodgey, so if they are not balanced and are not pro US, then who exactly are they lobbying for? Must be the terrorists, cause all they show us is US soldiers getting blown up:cool:
 
It's hopeless Peerie, this is how some on this forum view an Iraqi or Muslims in general...
jenkinsinstall_preview.jpg


If you critical of the US then you must be insane apparently :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
After that pointless derailment can we get back on topic? Anyone here capable of providing solid evidence of this so called propaganda on CNN?
 
I don't know who blocked this website in USA?

I con not log in there. by China goverment? or ...:D
 
But I just want to say. they didn't understand China, They didn't understand Chinese. They report the news with their color eye and their benefits.
 
After that pointless derailment can we get back on topic? Anyone here capable of providing solid evidence of this so called propaganda on CNN?

CNN has been accused of both in this thread, never mind though - examples of bias?

What's wrong with the wikipedia link posted earlier? If it's not good enough for you then post evidence to prove otherwise.
 
What's wrong with the wikipedia link posted earlier? If it's not good enough for you then post evidence to prove otherwise.

Oh yeah its really decisive:

Some conservative observers have claimed that CNN has liberal bias. Critics, such as Accuracy in Media and MRC, have claimed that CNN's reporting contains liberal editorializing within news stories. Former Republican House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, and MRC founder Brent Bozell, among others, have referred to CNN as the "Clinton News Network".[1] Delay has also called it the "Communist News Network".[2] In its early days, CNN was sometimes referred to as "Chicken Noodle News".[3]

Some liberal observers have claimed that CNN has a conservative bias. For example, Media Matters for America has documented several hundred separate instances of what it sees as conservative editorializing during CNN broadcasts.[4] Eric Alterman has noted that many critics on the left view CNN as no more or less biased than most other corporate-run journalism, supporting business interests of its parent company and sponsors, and refusing to question official sources or present perspectives of leftist critics.[5]

Is it possible for anyone here to have a personal opinion on the matter or do you all just get your opinions and standpoints from other people?
 
Oh yeah its really decisive:

I don't have a problem with wikipedia's article, you wanted evidence and it has been given to you.

Is it possible for anyone here to have a personal opinion on the matter or do you all just get your opinions and standpoints from other people?

What I want is news without a liberal or conservative bias, just the facts so that I can make up my own mind and sometimes news organizations try to do that for you...
Take the Rev. Wright debacle, I feel that he had every right to practice his "Freedom of speech" in HIS church yet I remember clearly watching AC360 after his video leaked and they were condemning the man from the outset rather than have a neutral dialogue about his statements.

All media networks will have an opinion that suits their target audience anyway but they do try to influence judgement in favor of an interested party.
 
But I just want to say. they didn't understand China, They didn't understand Chinese. They report the news with their color eye and their benefits.

So do you think state chinese reporting is fair?
 
What I want is news without a liberal or conservative bias, just the facts so that I can make up my own mind and sometimes news organizations try to do that for you...
Take the Rev. Wright debacle, I feel that he had every right to practice his "Freedom of speech" in HIS church yet I remember clearly watching AC360 after his video leaked and they were condemning the man from the outset rather than have a neutral dialogue about his statements.

LOL yes a neutral dialogue over how whities gave the black man aids to oppress and control him :o
 
LOL yes a neutral dialogue over how whities gave the black man aids to oppress and control him :o

And that's exactly why he should not have received the amount of attention he got, he's Obama's crazy Rev end of story.
 
And that's exactly why he should not have received the amount of attention he got, he's Obama's crazy Rev end of story.

LOL of course not what was I thinking. It's not like he was his mentor. Oh wait :o
 
I am sure that the chinese government is a great source of truth.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X