You Just described most of your government...Well, there's going to be little problem with that since Steam is required for activation of physical copies of games sold in the stores here. Doing that would be boneheaded, to put it mildly.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
You Just described most of your government...Well, there's going to be little problem with that since Steam is required for activation of physical copies of games sold in the stores here. Doing that would be boneheaded, to put it mildly.
Best they be careful, they may just go and lay a charge with the police against Steam, like Malema's wanted to do same with Twitter
Fire everybody at the Film and Publications Board and just adopt international ratings. Viola, money saved and a more efficient system.
The interviewer didn't seem to catch onto this glaring problem either, or just did a crap job by not clearing it up. Then again many people commenting are doing something similar, since it's media is illegal without a rating what makes them think they won't just make our ISPs block steam servers alltogether since they have no way to rate and allow single games on that service. What was that about customs intercepting downloads? Bet they won't be cracking jokes when their steam collection stops working.
Why do we even need a local classifications board when the games have already been classified by more competent overseas organisations? You see up to three different age restrictions when you buy a packaged game in SA.
Wow, this is a really bad article, the role of any reporter is to delve below the surface on questioning. The fact that they didn't bring up the issue of it being impossible for customs to confiscate digital media is just plain stupid.
Bad reporting.
Bad article.
However another thing that I found strange was when he spoke of how the fpb ratings are more focused on our society and cultures and how ESRB & PEGI don't mean squat here.
I personally think this entire fpb thing is a hocks a way to create more jobs that tax payers probably end up paying for. Cause let's face it these guys aren't actually skilled at there jobs... steam game at customs please. :wtf:
Is it just me, or does the interviewee not understand the the term "digital distribution"? Or maybe its my understanding thats slightly warped...
Juice
This could turn into a bit of a problem for the FPB... if they don't use under-age gamers, they will probably never get to all the hidden and hard-to-find content.Phumelele Faba said:The FPB will shortly commence a gaming classification pilot project which will involve gamers playing the games for the classification committee in real time.
Very bad, shocking actually. It is fairly obvious the person being interviewed does not know what is going on yet no attempt is made to help the person along. It seems fairly obvious the person being questioned is talking about physical objects. You should go back and explain that you are talking about online digital content distribution and ensure the person understands what steam, xbox etc offer. Also make sure they know we are downloading everything as in logging onto our computers, purchasing said goods and downloading them.
In all probability this was a set of questions that was emailed, and then responded to. (Sounds like that to me, anyway). Reporters often get their information in that manner. (Wouldn't you?) And perhaps the reporter was thinking of all the Steam users when he decided not to inform the FPB that they are being circumvented like this.IMO it's not the reporter's duty to educate a person in charge of these things. They should already be aware of the different forms of possible distribution and actively rating it where appropriate. But they need a new BMW, why pay for a 3 day course in education when they can go "vroooom" with their "compatriots" on the M1 without consequence...
If it was a face-to-face session I think the interviewer should have brought it to the attention of the person being interviewed that it isn't physical content that can be stopped at customs. But it's still sad....
I agree, it was pretty cruel of the interviewer not to point it out, unless they were intentionally taking the piss or were themselves ignorant....
If it makes a difference, this was an email interview, not a face-to-face one.
Customs are going to have to seize seacom and sat3.