Article: Malema, SARS reach agreement

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,439
Reaction score
9,969
Location
District 9
EFF leader Julius Malema's provisional sequestration has been extended to August 25, the High Court in Pretoria ruled on Monday.


Source : Sapa /gq/aa
Date : 26 May 2014 10:12
 
Malema is going to win the SARS cases.. He holds too much dirt on Zuma - There will be a mystery 16M donation or SARS will settle 'without any details' and the case will go away. In return, the EFF will announce a co-operation with the ANC
 
Yea.. we were just talking in the office about JuJu's case. Mutual feeling is he will just walk away free. Nothing ever happens to these politicians ...
 
MALEMA, SARS ENTER SETTLEMENT

Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema has reached a settlement agreement with the SA Revenue Service (Sars), the High Court in Pretoria heard on Monday.

"Overnight... Mr Malema entered into a conditional compromise agreement [with Sars]," Nic Maritz, for Sars, told the court.

"The parties have agreed to an extension."

Tumi Mokwena, for Malema, confirmed the settlement agreement.

Malema's provisional sequestration was extended and the matter was postponed to August 25.

A draft order was handed to Judge Cynthia Pretorius who signed it. Malema was not in court.

According to court papers, Malema owed Sars R16 million plus interest after failing to submit tax returns between 2006 and 2010.

In 2010 Sars contacted Malema about his failure to submit tax returns. It took Malema 18 months, after many attempts by Sars, to file his outstanding returns.

Malema also failed to register the Ratanang Trust for tax purposes, and Sars had to do this on his behalf. Sars attached some of Malema's property to recoup the taxes he owed.

In February, high court Judge Bill Prinsloo ordered that Malema's estate be provisionally sequestrated.

Malema and anyone else who did not want the order to be made final had had until 10am on May 26 to give reasons why this should not happen.

A final sequestration order would affect Malema's political career, as he would not be allowed to serve as a Member of Parliament.


Source : Sapa /gq/jk/lp/jje
Date : 26 May 2014 10:50
 
This just sets a massively bad precedent in my opinion....

Its the typical "Some are more equal than others" nonsense.
 
The article is full of contradictions...

'Settlement'
'Parties agreed to an extension'
'conditional compromise agreement [with Sars]'

Which one is it?!
 
It will end up being a settlement, that will be shielded from public view.

Malema is trying to put together something to keep the sequestration at bay, which is what the extension is for.
 
Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema has reached a settlement agreement with the SA Revenue Service (Sars), the High Court in Pretoria heard on Monday.

"Overnight... Mr Malema entered into a conditional compromise agreement [with Sars]," Nic Maritz, for Sars, told the court.
 
The article is full of contradictions...

'Settlement'
'Parties agreed to an extension'
'conditional compromise agreement [with Sars]'

Which one is it?!

No contradiction. Malema makes an offer to pay to SARS over a certain period. SARS accepts the offer and says they will delay the sequestration order as long as he makes payments. So he has until August to make so many payments. If he does not, then the Sequestration order will proceed in August.
 
It will end up being a settlement, that will be shielded from public view.

Malema is trying to put together something to keep the sequestration at bay, which is what the extension is for.

He intends of paying which is inevitable because he doesn't want to lose his MP seat.
 
No contradiction. Malema makes an offer to pay to SARS over a certain period. SARS accepts the offer and says they will delay the sequestration order as long as he makes payments. So he has until August to make so many payments. If he does not, then the Sequestration order will proceed in August.

If thats the case, Malema has won... the public will never know the details and he is scott free. Zuma will hang this over Malemas head and every time he steps out of line the 'SARS' case will rear its head.
 
If thats the case, Malema has won... the public will never know the details and he is scott free. Zuma will hang this over Malemas head and every time he steps out of line the 'SARS' case will rear its head.

Well we know that a trust fund was set up by his friends to help him make the payments. Maybe they go enough cash to at least make an arrangement with SARS.

I dunno how that works though, because surely any donations are also taxable! :D
 
If thats the case, Malema has won... the public will never know the details and he is scott free. Zuma will hang this over Malemas head and every time he steps out of line the 'SARS' case will rear its head.

exactly...

There it shows , JZ's powa. Malema wil dance to Zuma's tune... and Zumie will probably use EFF powa when required...

Surprised? Nope...
 
exactly...

There it shows , JZ's powa. Malema wil dance to Zuma's tune... and Zumie will probably use EFF powa when required...

Surprised? Nope...

If thats the case, Malema has won... the public will never know the details and he is scott free. Zuma will hang this over Malemas head and every time he steps out of line the 'SARS' case will rear its head.

Tinfoil hats optional?
 
MALEMA ADMITS TO NEGLECTING TAX

Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema on Monday admitted he had not attended to his tax affairs the way the law required.

"I left my financial affairs in the hands of others without making sure that my obligations were complied with," he said in a statement following the extension of his provisional sequestration.

"I accepted and acted on the advice from persons, which in hindsight, I should not have."

The High Court in Pretoria earlier on Monday postponed the sequestration matter to August 25 after an agreement was entered into between Malema and the SA Revenue Service.

Nic Maritz, for Sars, told the court the two had entered into a conditional compromise agreement.

Judge Cynthia Pretorius signed a draft order handed up to her.

According to court papers, Malema owed Sars R16 million plus interest after failing to submit tax returns between 2006 and 2010.

In 2010 Sars contacted Malema about his failure to submit tax returns. It took Malema 18 months, after many attempts by Sars, to file his outstanding returns.

Malema also failed to register the Ratanang Trust for tax purposes, and Sars had to do this on his behalf. Sars attached some of Malema's property to recoup the taxes he owed.

In February, high court Judge Bill Prinsloo ordered that Malema's estate be provisionally sequestrated.

Malema and anyone else who did not want the order to be made final had had until 10am on May 26 to give reasons why this should not happen.

A final sequestration order would affect Malema's political career, as he would not be allowed to serve as a Member of Parliament.

Malema said he was informed by Sars on Monday morning that it had accepted a settlement offer.

"The offer was conditional on a number of aspects, including that I accept that I failed in my past tax obligations... I failed to declare certain income in the past, and consequently failed to pay certain amounts of tax during the required period," he said.

"I accept that additional assessments for tax years 2011 and 2012 will follow and will include further amounts which will include capital, added understatement penalties, and interest.

"I have committed to ensure that my tax affairs will be in order going forward."

Malema said the offer he made to Sars included an additional amount to be paid by him over and above the amount that was collected by the curator bonis for Sars in selling off his assets.

He said he hoped to put the matter behind him and focus on the future.


Source : Sapa /gq/jk/jje/lp
Date : 26 May 2014 12:20
 
Complete load of twaddle....

"I left my financial affairs in the hands of others without making sure that my obligations were complied with," he said in a statement following the extension of his provisional sequestration.

"I accepted and acted on the advice from persons, which in hindsight, I should not have."

Ignorance is not a defence.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X