Mike Hoxbig
Honorary Master
Or just get a Razr MaxxSo battery capacities continue to be the bottleneck in smartphone development....
/waiting for the next big breakthrough re battery tech... going to happen soon, I just know it!!!
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Or just get a Razr MaxxSo battery capacities continue to be the bottleneck in smartphone development....
/waiting for the next big breakthrough re battery tech... going to happen soon, I just know it!!!
Look, there's a very simple solid reason that Nokia is doing this: they still have an enormous amount of sales at the lower end of the market. In fact their low end handsets are currently arguably more compelling than their high end ones.
My understanding is that WP is less processing power hungry than Android. Of course the trade off is that you can do more on your Android than WP (i.e. Android is more 'customisable' - whatever that means).
Teaser...!
All to be revealed today in London.
Update:
![]()
Expect the Lumia 928. As you can see, with aluminium casing. Thinner, lighter. Not taller.
My understanding is that WP is less processing power hungry than Android. Of course the trade off is that you can do more on your Android than WP (i.e. Android is more 'customisable' - whatever that means).
Nokia going Android would be the certain path to suicide. Of that there is no doubt.
Nokia cannot out-manufacture Samsung. Period. To compete head-on with Samsung would lead to a zero margin war of attrition, and that is a war Nokia will lose.
The choices are stark: Apple is forever closed and inert. The Android world will always be dominated by the largest and lowest-cost manufacturer which is larger than all the rest combined (ie Samsung and the Seven Dwarfs). Nokia's only sane choice was to throw everything into building the only third ecosystem with any chance of survival in a world utterly dominated by iDroid.
So why would this appeal to any current Android user? Such limitations exhibit pretty shoddy OS development IMO, simply because there doesn't seem to be any forethought that was put into their multitasking solution...
Were Nokia to go Android, they'd have a brief and bright flame-up in sales, and then a spectacular flame-out when the Korean behemoth strikes back.
Alright, besides the fickle shareholders.
You've heard of the 'EOS', the 'Catwalk' and murmurs of a tablet...
I also heard they are planning on releasing the Nokia Max, which will have a 4.7" display and 512MB RAM.
Like Samsung (okay, so they are the boss - for now), Nokia is also going to be releasing this bigger Lumia to compete with Samsung's Galaxy Grand (a.k.a poor man's GS3/4).
The Max is said to be marketed as a Lumia 6xx variant indicating a lower middle market focus.
May 14 and 15 is going to be very interesting.

No, it's not head-on. WP devices are made by others, but they have no commitment to ecosystems. They are device makers only.
Nokia's Board knew they could never compete and survive in world where the only differentiator is device and price, because the Asians can do both better and cheaper. They also knew that devices are all about ecosystems, and it is precisely there that European nouse, design and IP (eg mapping/nav, music, etc) can be leveraged to gain advantage over the East Asians.
Nokia's strategy is the only sane one with a chance of long-term survival.
And I see the Chinease behemoths are striking back anyway so Nokia's Windows Phone only territory is not so safe as some might let you think.
Huawei Ascend W1($115) is not a bad little phone, and its cheaper than Nokia's 520 ($150)
"Never keep all your eggs in one basket."