according to the article the farmer knew the boy very well. He said the boy used to open the gate for him. The boy therefore could not have been trespassing. His parents work in the farm and probably live there as well. There's a possibility that there are other children in the same vicinity. Therefore, I agree that it was a mistake and not racially motivated. But the fact remains that this farmer should have received a stiffer penalty. He was negligent and irresponsible with a gun - a deadly weapon. So please let's not try and bring more issues (racism, crime) into this. I don't think such issues fit in this debate. Perhaps it's an indication of how paranoid people are in SA. Everything has to be racially motivated because there's blah, blah, blah crime and farm murders and so on. C'mon thought the boy was a dog. No where does it say that he was being attacked by criminals.100%
people tend to blow things out of proportion,IMO what would you do if you were a farmer,Nowadays farmers let alone normal south africans are constantly in danger from crime/murder.
This 11 year old should never of been there,Why why why did he go into/onto the farmers property and what was the boy doing on his property.
you guys sit and ask and defend the child becos he is a child yes? well WAKE up!!! ive seen 8 year olds thrown into peoples cars and hi jack them,Ive had a child crawl through my window and open my locked door so his older/bigger friends can come and ohhhh say rob me!!
there are worse things that has happened that we will never know, than a child been mistaken for a animal and a farmer being vigilant
peace out!
Last edited: