CapeXit 2

Poll is for all in South Africa -

  • Do you believe W/Cape secession from the Republic is feasible ?

    Votes: 28 34.1%
  • Would you support a bid for W/Cape to secede from the Republic ?

    Votes: 33 40.2%
  • In the event of secession being successful, would you consider migrating to W/Cape ?

    Votes: 23 28.0%
  • In the event of secession being successful, would you consider migrating out of W/Cape ?

    Votes: 3 3.7%
  • Would you support other provinces bids for secession ?

    Votes: 20 24.4%
  • I disagree to all questions

    Votes: 35 42.7%
  • Would you support a "Swiss Canton" style of governance for the Republic ?

    Votes: 24 29.3%

  • Total voters
    82
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nonsense. They're both useful, and not. In this case clearly well researched, it certainly didn't thumb suck that answer.

I try to only use them to derive difficult to determine facts.
no, not nonsense - we may as well relinquish debate and resort to conversation with bots.


i can see your school reports now:
"brian can do better - must try harder"
 
Bit of a stupid comparison Brian.. Lots of what happened to bring nazi Germany about was not democratic.

Lots of what's happening here is certainly not democratic - when did we have a vote on changing the law to only favour "previously disadvantaged"?
Certainly, that handicap was quite some time ago now..
 
It's the secessionists who wish to inflict their desires on others, not the other way around.
You're doing it again. This is starting to make you look really bad, dude.

That's a bad habit verging on anti-social.

When have I ever advocated to force my preferred rule-set onto anyone?

Quite the opposite, I'd much prefer people get exactly what they want and let the chips fall where they may.


In the real world, getting more people to support the cause improves your chances of success, no matter how you believe the world should actually work.
Correct. And doing so peacefully involves confining yourself to make the strongest argument you can. As opposed to passing laws to force your preferred rule-set onto the unwilling.

🤷‍♂️

It's not rocket science but you're kicking and screaming at the prospect others will catch on.
 
no, not nonsense - we may as well relinquish debate and resort to conversation with bots.

I'm more careful than you think - AI makes me veeery nervous. But we have to move forward with the times too.
 
It got lost in the incoming posts. Link, please?

 
Lots of what's happening here is certainly not democratic - when did we have a vote on changing the law to only favour "previously disadvantaged"?
Certainly, that handicap was quite some time ago now..
Not quite on the same level, so your comparison is still stupid.
 
Lots of what's happening here is certainly not democratic - when did we have a vote on changing the law to only favour "previously disadvantaged"?
Certainly, that handicap was quite some time ago now..

Which law?
You're doing it again. This is starting to make you look really bad, dude.

That's a bad habit verging on anti-social.

When have I ever advocated to force my preferred rule-set onto anyone?

Quite the opposite, I'd much prefer people get exactly what they want and let the chips fall where they may.



Correct. And doing so peacefully involves confining yourself to make the strongest argument you can. As opposed to passing laws to force your preferred rule-set onto the unwilling.

🤷‍♂️

It's not rocket science but you're kicking and screaming at the prospect others will catch on.

I have made it clear that I live in the real world. Sorry.

The reason that secession goes absolutely nowhere is because its fans don't live in the real world.
 
I'm more careful than you think - AI makes me veeery nervous. But we have to move forward with the times too.
here's an idea
instead of asking a question to which you will receive a vague opinion, instead ask a direct question requesting the document that supports "x, y & z"
 
Right so you've changed your tune.... suddenly lexity is normal.


We'll just have to take your word for it since you're too chicken-****... even to post google's definition.
Huh? Put down the spliff.
 
here's an idea
instead of asking a question to which you will receive a vague opinion, instead ask a direct question requesting the document that supports "x, y & z"

I've had quite some practice, go to those depths when it's needed, or just giving it a nudge sometimes is enough. ChatGPT is one of the better ones with finding facts.
 
Lex, if you're wondering if that outstanding question is a trick question - yes.
 
I do admire your "live and let live" philosophy, but how far do you take it?

For instance, if a village decided they want to make murder okay under certain circumstances, do you allow it to go on without interference? Specifically, since that could end up a threat to you, does that then change the consideration?

Ok. Good question. (we are proceeding on the basis that this is relevant to the topic of capexit)

'We' already tolerate murder. That's a fact in the case of the large village in the international community called the USA.

That happened following 9/11.... the ptb decide to hell with limits on the State, we can now assassinate US citizens anywhere in the world.

🤷‍♂️

Do we do nothing about it?

By now you should know, but let me remind you.... the one thing that mass criminals fear above all else is......

Let's see if you can guess:

(clue: s..... o........ and e...... b......)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X