Cellular providers upbeat about iPhone

This blog is really bad... filled with factual inaccuracies, its like the writer didn't even bother to watch the keynote at all. not the usual standard for cnet at all.

I'm not judging, just pointing out where the Samsung thing linked to :) However the reference to Samsung is made via another article and not directly to the blog.
 
Noted, I wasn't saying that the reference to samsung wasn't valid... seems to be based on a research report... sorta neither here nor there - same as the ARM reference. Maybe we'll find out a bit more in the next couple of days.
 
gonna c if my dad can get me 1 from the states..
hehe :)
wonder when it comes out thou(me go look). he come back in march.
 
What is the source of the reports of it being a samsung chip?

Samsung uses ARM cores in their chips .... ARM do not make any physical chips but microprocessor cores (chip building blocks) which they license out.

Samsung supplied the guts of the new iPod Nano which incidently uses two ARM cores.
 
Interesting info, and it makes sense. Apple will have to make sure that the sound quaity on the phone at least matches that of the ipod. Plus they have a new challenge... making the speaker sound just as good. This is something they have been terrible at with the speakers on the MBP's being particularly bad.
 
I think if these SP are going to provide IPHONEs maybe they should first make sure they have qualified technical support. Else as a consumer we suffer so much from this type of issues.

Like my experience with Vodacom their IPHONE policy is swap as they don't repair. This is because they don't have any APPLE certified technicians. Having this said, one comes to ask what are the criterias or rules set by whom to conclude what is REALLY wrong with an IPHONE that is faulty??
 
Ballmei, I think we have a new record, dumping a 5 years old thread, the op has moved on and so has the readers.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X