South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Hi, I hear what you guys are saying but according to several video mags the ratio between screen size and viewing distance should be 1:4 meaning 1m screen = sitting 4m from your screen. I stay in a townhouse and sit 3M from my screen. This works out brillitantly with a 32" and the fact that the 32" fits the budget also helps !!!!!!! Paying 50 - 60% more for 4" ........???? Is it REALLLLLY worth it??? I'm connecting a DVD & DSTV to the screen with my Denon h/t doing the audio. The fact that the pvision LCD has a 5.1 surr sound optical output also is a + ( not that I'll really use it , good extra feature but for re-selling )useless said:he's going for the Pvision 32" LCD unit.
Zigackly:quik said:PS: I've generally found that the colour reproduction on 12ms panels is better than on the 8ms panels, and you most definately can't see the difference where motion blur is concerned, becauese there is none on either.
It's all got to do with the DACs they use, where the 8ms panels will generally use less bits to increase speed, thus sacrificing colour range and saturation etc. I won't go into too much detail now seeing as I'm halfway into bed, but it's definately noticable, esp if you compare two panels side by side. Might not be the case with all 8ms panels but so far in my experience it has been.
So is a cheap Plasma set better than a cheap LCD set?arf9999 said:If I was only going to spend 10k, I would stay away from LCD completely. At that price Plasma is a better buy - even if it is not HD compatible. A good 32" LCD should be around R15K.
That's comparing cheap to expensive I'd say.arf9999 said:If you don't believe me, go and do a comparison instore. Set up a cheap LCD next to a Plasma and a Sony BRAVIA or Samsung LCD with a demanding video input (doesn't even have to be a HD input). You'll find the cheaper LCD really unpleasant in comparison.
A Standard Definition plasma is better than a cheap 'n nasty High Definition LCD. The difference between a cheaper Plasma (SD) and a better brand is less than the diff between cheap LCD and branded.zeb said:So is a cheap Plasma set better than a cheap LCD set?
er no, 'cos you're comparing it to plasma as well as more expensive LCDs.zeb said:That's comparing cheap to expensive I'd say.
burn-in is a fundamental issue with plasma, but not to the extent that the lcd brigade would have you believe. newer models have picture shift functions and burn-in compensation modes (very bright white for a few minutes). I repeat: for 10K I'd buy plasma. but if I didn't have to buy immediately, I'd wait for lcd prices to drop.swordfish1 said:yeah I would also like to suggest plasma, but I won't, main reason: BURN IN
CIS said:Hi sword - I saw the Telefunken at Hi-Fi Corrupt yesterday but the picture is really not that hot hey !!!! It was running next to a Toshiba going for R 13999.99 , much better buy if you ask me. Funny enough the Sansui didn't look to bad either - can't remember the price though but it actually compated pretty well next to the Toshiba............ The @#$@#% exchange rate is of course another concern - losing just about every day.
Just checked their website - not to terrible !!! They have 11% market share in LCD's and are the 3rd largest supplier. ( Somewhere the math sound funny with 11% m/share but 3rd largest supplier ????? ).useless said:BenQ has some nice looking widescreen 20" and higher LCD's, but i am not sure if those have component inputs... they dont seem to bad as i have a 19" LCD of 8ms which isnt too shabby.
EsquireCIS said:.......... I just need to track down a distributor / supplier of BenQ in Cape Town somewhere.