Soprono
Expert Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,920
- Reaction score
- 405
What differences are you seeing vs non-warp? Curious as I was recently looking into the premium option. But couldn't see anything/findings for us local peeps.
-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: Google Maps vs Waze vs Apple Maps vs physical paper maps?
Cool Ideas Fibre ISP – Feedback Thread 4
- Thread starter TheRoDent
- Start date
- Status
What differences are you seeing vs non-warp? Curious as I was recently looking into the premium option. But couldn't see anything/findings for us local peeps.
Nah this is premium. Though to be honest I've traced quite a few routes with a free account and premium and there is zero difference.
Lately I haven't seen latency even to London below about 170-180ms.
CrypticZA
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2019
- Messages
- 4,624
- Reaction score
- 2,625
So i use the old wireguard method and it still gives me warp+ for free haha where a friend uses their app and at times we have seen routes be slightly different where my route had slightly better latency but it has been a rare sight. I almost always would go via WACS where sometimes she would go via a slightly longer route and hit London with 160ms
CrypticZA
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2019
- Messages
- 4,624
- Reaction score
- 2,625
What is the IP i'll just check on my side for interest sake?
I'm gonna have to jot down some server IPs when I play again. Pinging the London lobby server gives me 142ms. But in-game it has consistently been minimum 173ms going all the way up to 200ms of late. Actually cancelled my subscription from next month because it's been so poor.
bHOLDher
Well-Known Member
Something seems a bit broken to teams.microsoft.com? Sometimes showing the same IP in the trace:
Code:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 192.168.3.2 - 0 | 298 | 298 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 154.0.0.113 - 0 | 298 | 298 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| 154.0.4.194 - 0 | 298 | 298 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Request timed out. - 100 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 154.0.4.194 - 81 | 71 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Request timed out. - 100 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 196.223.14.173 - 38 | 119 | 74 | 2 | 5 | 23 | 3 |
| ae21-0.icr01.jnb20.ntwk.msn.net - 77 | 73 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 21 | 7 |
| be-100-0.ibr01.jnb20.ntwk.msn.net - 70 | 79 | 24 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 3 |
| 196.223.14.173 - 87 | 67 | 9 | 0 | 18 | 23 | 23 |
| ae100-0.icr01.cpt20.ntwk.msn.net - 51 | 99 | 49 | 0 | 20 | 60 | 3 |
| ae27-0.cpt02-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net - 28 | 141 | 102 | 4 | 23 | 48 | 22 |
| 13.104.186.208 - 20 | 167 | 134 | 2 | 21 | 36 | 3 |
| ae27-0.cpt02-96cbe-1b.ntwk.msn.net - 66 | 83 | 29 | 0 | 22 | 24 | 23 |
| 154.0.4.194 - 71 | 78 | 23 | 0 | 15 | 32 | 3 |
| 13.104.186.208 - 96 | 62 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 27 | 27 |
| 52.113.194.132 - 36 | 123 | 79 | 0 | 20 | 33 | 3 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v1.00 GPLv2 (original by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider)
Well there is 1 big difference. Torrents. On Warp+ it's max speed where with free it's slow.
Yeah this works but there is also the difference between ipv4 and ipv6 routes.
Yeah, something weird's going on. Just played a game - my in-game ping was above 200ms. The trace resolves to this, with an expected ping. Not sure what to make of it:
Code:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| 172.16.0.1 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 172.68.185.1 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 197.157.64.174 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| No response from host - 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| cr1-amx-et42.wolcomm.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 141 | 141 | 141 | 141 |
| 212.119.4.176 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 141 | 141 | 141 | 141 |
| ae-12.r21.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 145 | 145 | 146 | 146 |
| ae-16.r20.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 154 | 154 | 155 | 154 |
| ae-0.r21.frnkge13.de.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 157 | 157 | 157 | 157 |
| ae-8.r00.lxmblc01.lu.bb.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 158 | 158 | 159 | 158 |
|ae-9-2644.r00.lxmblc01.lu.ce.gin.ntt.net - 0 | 2 | 2 | 162 | 164 | 166 | 162 |
| 188.42.168.223 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 162 | 164 | 166 | 162 |
| 188.42.42.118 - 0 | 2 | 2 | 161 | 161 | 162 | 162 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
WinMTR v0.92 GPL V2 by Appnor MSP - Fully Managed Hosting & Cloud Provider
breezy1337
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2022
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm getting 190ms to London servers, where it used to be 155ms. It's only been like this since this morning for me. What's going on?
Edit: I'm in Cape Town
Edit: I'm in Cape Town
CrypticZA
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2019
- Messages
- 4,624
- Reaction score
- 2,625
We don't have access to IPV6
We don't have access to IPV6
Cloudflare does it for you. They now do the 6to4 automatically on Warp if you use their app or if you use wireguard
I don't get the same behaviour through my London VPS. 140-150ms pings. Unless CF is prioritising by traffic type now.
CrypticZA
Expert Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2019
- Messages
- 4,624
- Reaction score
- 2,625
That IP address is in Luxemburg
Connection is going London -> Paris -> Luxemburg
LON - PAR - LUX
A lookup of the IP confirms the location
CISP gives me 158 and warp gives me 162ms which is accurate for that region i know since Dota 2 EU servers are in the location
EDIT* Warp just takes you via Amsterdam as well so thats where the extra latency comes from so not sure?
Last edited:
Soprono
Expert Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,920
- Reaction score
- 405
Yeah, I'm on NZB's already so that solves max speed ect. I was just curious overall about it and what differences the guys see that would make it worth it for them
Im very rarely on an international lobby besides for my sim racing but as you know, when you see something that sounds cool and gets traction you always wonder what the returns are even when we most likely dont need it
OK so Openserve finally released the line, CI took over. Now I have to wait 24-48 hours for the router. They said I can use another router in the meantime and gave me the ppoe stuff.
Since the ONT works as a router too, can I use that? And if so, how? Because I can't seem to access the thing. I've tried wireless, wired, made sure of no proxy. Made sure of ip 192.168.100.1, made static ip and used the above as gateway, even hard reset it etc, still can't connect to the thing...?
Since the ONT works as a router too, can I use that? And if so, how? Because I can't seem to access the thing. I've tried wireless, wired, made sure of no proxy. Made sure of ip 192.168.100.1, made static ip and used the above as gateway, even hard reset it etc, still can't connect to the thing...?
Yeah, it looks like ping latency is far lower than in-game latency when using WARP for me. I thought it was perhaps the Apex hamster servers, but I don't get the same results on my own VPS+Wireguard solution, which is why I'm wondering if WARP has started prioritising traffic by type.
Connect your PC directly to the ONT via network cable. Reset all the changes you made above. Create a new PPPoE connection in Windows with the login details CISP gave you, using automatically assigned IP / DNS, then dial it.
TheLostPacket
Well-Known Member
No, you cant use the ONT as a router because it doesnt dial the pppoe connection. It purely acts as a fibre to copper conversion. You need a router to dial the pppoe, or you can use you laptop and have it dial the connection when plugged directly into the ONT
Thanks, I'll try when I'm back home.
- Status