Coup/protest in the US

lexity said:
Another Crayian red-flag.
Click to expand...
en.wikipedia.org

Sealioning - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity ("I'm just trying to have a debate"), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.[1][2][3][4] It may take the form of "incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate",[5] and has been likened to a denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings.[6] The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomic Wondermark by David Malki,[7] which The Independent called "the most apt description of Twitter you'll ever see".[8]


The sealioner feigns ignorance and politeness while making relentless demands for answers and evidence (while often ignoring or sidestepping any evidence the target has already presented), under the guise of "just trying to have a debate",[1][2][4][9] so that when the target is eventually provoked into an angry response, the sealioner can act as the aggrieved party, and the target presented as closed-minded and unreasonable.[3][10][11] It has been described as "incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate".[5] Sealioning can be performed by an individual or by a group acting in concert.[12]
Click to expand...
 
lexity said:
Higgins does actually speak, in the TC interview.

I can confirm.... it's not just TC speaking for 40 minutes.

Here is hard evidence of him doing just that....

rumble.com

Here's What Really Happened on January 6th

Unlock all-new shows from Tucker and his team: https://bit.ly/3RCq6cc This the smartest, best informed account of what actually happened on January 6th. Tucker Carlson interviews Congressman Clay Higg
rumble.com rumble.com
Click to expand...
So I decided to listen to it in the background, he says a lot of things without presenting any actual evidence. It's a great story but there are precious few facts listed. TC doesn't question much at all. The only time he even showed a bit of incredulity was when he requested confirmation on the "200 undercover FBI assets". The actual evidence of all of this exists according to him, but is, of course, "a secret". So at the moment, it's a narrative without any actual public evidence to back it up.

I noticed you ignored that part where TC was found to say things on air that he disagreed with in private. Is that someone who you would consider to be acting in good faith?
 
From the interview, at 5:00....

TC: You certainly answered the question right there, in larger terms. You just said that elements within the federal government - I assume law enforcement, intel and military - and I'm using your words: 'lured' Americans in Washington into what you called 'a trap'.

Higgins: Yes, sir.
Click to expand...

Footage shows Higgins asking the FBI at a hearing, to deny there were any government plants within the group of Trump supporters on Jan 6. The FBI is clearly unprepared to deny it i.e. to confirm there weren't any federal government assets disguised as Trump supporters.

Higgins: Did you have 'Confidential Human Sources' dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on Jan 6th, prior to the doors being open?

FBI official: I have to be very careful....

Higgins: It should be a NO! Can you not tell the American people [...] ?

FBI official: (Stumbles over his words...) [don't construe anything I've said...]
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Cray said:
I noticed you ignored that part where TC was found to say things on air that he disagreed with in private. Is that someone who you would consider to be acting in good faith?
Click to expand...
You mean this? :

"I don't think there is evidence of voter fraud that swung the election," producer Alex Pfeiffer texted to Carlson, per the lawsuit. "The software s--t is absurd," Carlson allegedly responded. "Half our viewers have seen the Maria clip."

ON-AIR: On his show just one night later, Carlson pushed more suggestions of fraud, though he said "we don't know anything about the software."

"We don't know how many votes were stolen on Tuesday night. We don't know anything about the software that many say was rigged. We don't know. We ought to find out," he said. "But here's what we do know. On a larger level, at the highest levels, actually, our system isn't what we thought it was. It's not as fair as it should be. Not even close."
Click to expand...


There's no discrepancy, bub. Wishful thinking has captured your imagination.
 
414489556_10161251572189382_8667956819005856704_n.jpg
 
Cray said:
You lecturing people on trolling is absolute gold.
Click to expand...
Engaging with people such that they discredit themselves is hardly trolling. I can understand why you'd find it aggravating to deal with, though.
 
Cray said:
So I decided to listen to it in the background, he says a lot of things without presenting any actual evidence. It's a great story but there are precious few facts listed. TC doesn't question much at all. The only time he even showed a bit of incredulity was when he requested confirmation on the "200 undercover FBI assets". The actual evidence of all of this exists according to him, but is, of course, "a secret". So at the moment, it's a narrative without any actual public evidence to back it up.

I noticed you ignored that part where TC was found to say things on air that he disagreed with in private. Is that someone who you would consider to be acting in good faith?
Click to expand...
I would classify this as standard for legacy media. And it's probably why TC eventually had to get out. One can only wonder how it took him so long. But I guess nobody's perfect.

Btw.... you've ignored my questions.

There were 2 people in the interview. See #1294
 
lexity said:
I would classify this as standard for legacy media. And it's probably why TC eventually had to get out.
Click to expand...
That's a novel way of saying that he was fired...

lexity said:
One can only wonder how it took him so long. But I guess nobody's perfect.

Btw.... you've ignored my questions.

There were 2 people in the interview. See #1294
Click to expand...
Sorry, which questions? Please link the post, #1294 doesn't pose any question that I can see.
 
Ivan Leon said:
How does the legacy media collude to destroy independent voices by systematically repeating the exact same messaging? This is how.

14333457858691105899


Link to video:
rumble.com

This Is Really Happening

How does the legacy media collude to destroy independent voices by systematically repeating the exact same messaging? This is how.
rumble.com rumble.com
Click to expand...
Did Russel happen to mention this one? If not, you might want to ask yourself why he deliberately omitted it.

 
Cray said:
That's a novel way of saying that he was fired...


Sorry, which questions? Please link the post, #1294 doesn't pose any question that I can see.
Click to expand...
#1294 shows 2 people in an interview. We are well along the slippery totalitarian slope but I believe that is still generally understood to be the minimum pre-requisite.

The questions were:

He doesn't have to be unbiased to be 'a very good journalist', tho', right?

That's where you and I are supposed to come in.

For you to get to the truth, is it required of you to factor in a journalists bias? Or to suppress it through self-censorship?

It's either one or the other. It can't be both. So which is it, for you?
Click to expand...
 
Trump-Mugshot-Final.jpg


Imagine being in President Trump’s shoes for a moment on J6 as you get word the Capitol is getting swarmed…

- You were considered a near lock to be a two-term president in February of 2020 - You delivered one of the best economies ever seen for 3 years before China unleashed a lab grown virus on the planet

- You warned states repeatedly of the dangers of mass mail-in voting, but Democrats forced the measures through anyways

- You watched as election officials caved to COVID fear mongering to relax election integrity measures violating election laws and state Constitutions

- You witness 51 “intelligence officials” collude with Big Tech to censor a bombshell story about a laptop that directly implicated Joe Biden

- You campaign tirelessly to sold-out arenas crisscrossing the country with historic enthusiasm

- Your opponent is a two-time failed candidate, disqualified for plagiarism, who barely survived the primary, and then barely left his basement during the campaign

- You win 74,222,958 votes, more than any other presidential candidate has ever won

- You learn that somehow 159,633,396 people voted, the largest turnout in U.S. history, breaking the previous record by 20 million votes — the first time more than 140 million people voted and the highest % turnout in 120 years

- You somehow “lose” by 42,000 votes in 3 states among a host of irregularities, drop box scandals, and controversies and despite winning practically every bellwether county and state

- You think back and remember they spied on your campaign, invented a fake Russia hoax, impeached you and constantly smeared and lied about you in the media

- You remember that anarchists and race hustlers unleashed months of riots and chaos in a possible domestic color revolution

- You remember that you offered National Guard troops on J6 but the offer was denied by Nancy Pelosi and Muriel Bowser

- You remember that you said just hours before to peacefully and patriotically march

- You remember everything you’d given up in your previous life to be hated, attacked, and vilified by the DC snakes, insiders, and elitists

- Your own VP just fist-bumped Nancy Pelosi inside the Capitol

- You realize the entire DC cabal has conspired and plotted to hand the White House to a puppet they could control

Is it any wonder why Trump might have been a little upset on J6?

He wasn’t responsible for what happened despite what the media says. It was four years of lying, cheating, and betrayal by those who wanted to get Trump at all costs.

Nevertheless, he gathered himself and released a video telling people to go home—an act the illegitimate J6 Committee tried to criminalize.

Then they impeached him again.

Despite all of it, he’s decided to come back to retake the White House and finish what he started, a decision that provoked Biden’s DOJ to indict him multiple times for 700 years in federal prison.

Who else could endure what Donald Trump has?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1744136981616243045
 
lexity said:
#1294 shows 2 people in an interview. We are well along the slippery totalitarian slope but I believe that is still generally understood to be the minimum pre-requisite.

The questions were:
Click to expand...
All journalists have some degree of bias, I don't consider him to be an actual journalist as opposed to an opionista. He is very quick to offer his opinion but short of interviewing people with a very softball approach, I don't consider him to be much of a journalist.

Again, If I feel that a journalist is not interested in facts as opposed to pushing a false narrative, I don't consider them worth my time. Alex Jones would be on that list along with TC.

I listened to the whole Higgs interview, it didn't change my opinion on TC at all.
 
Last edited:
lmao said:
He doesn't work for CNN. Duh.

square-m.d32908a5.jpg
Click to expand...

CNN has slammed the world's best satire site, The Babylon Bee, after CNN executives realized that "fake news" articles on the website were getting at least as much social media traction as their own.

"There ain't room in this internet for the both of us," growled one CNN anchor on the air Monday evening. "There simply aren't enough people out there for us to fool with our fake news stories and The Babylon Bee to fool with their satire. There isn't enough clickbait and outrage traffic to go around."

Reporters at the media outlet also pointed out that their news was "much faker" than The Babylon Bee's.

"They're obviously amateurs over there at The Bee," said Brian Stelter. "A lot of times, their reporting comes true. If you're gonna do fake news, do it right -- 100% fake, guaranteed, 24/7. They really should learn from the pros over here at CNN."

"Stay out of our territory," he growled.

GDRmoiNXAAA-wb_


babylonbee.com

CNN Attacks Babylon Bee: 'The Internet Is Only Big Enough For One Fake News Site'

U.S.—CNN has slammed the world's best satire site, The Babylon Bee, after CNN executives realized that "fake news" articles on the website were getting at least as much social media traction as their own.
babylonbee.com babylonbee.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X