Coup/protest in the US

Trump-Mugshot-Final.jpg


Imagine being in President Trump’s shoes for a moment on J6 as you get word the Capitol is getting swarmed…

- You were considered a near lock to be a two-term president in February of 2020 - You delivered one of the best economies ever seen for 3 years before China unleashed a lab grown virus on the planet

- You warned states repeatedly of the dangers of mass mail-in voting, but Democrats forced the measures through anyways

- You watched as election officials caved to COVID fear mongering to relax election integrity measures violating election laws and state Constitutions

- You witness 51 “intelligence officials” collude with Big Tech to censor a bombshell story about a laptop that directly implicated Joe Biden

- You campaign tirelessly to sold-out arenas crisscrossing the country with historic enthusiasm

- Your opponent is a two-time failed candidate, disqualified for plagiarism, who barely survived the primary, and then barely left his basement during the campaign

- You win 74,222,958 votes, more than any other presidential candidate has ever won

- You learn that somehow 159,633,396 people voted, the largest turnout in U.S. history, breaking the previous record by 20 million votes — the first time more than 140 million people voted and the highest % turnout in 120 years

- You somehow “lose” by 42,000 votes in 3 states among a host of irregularities, drop box scandals, and controversies and despite winning practically every bellwether county and state

- You think back and remember they spied on your campaign, invented a fake Russia hoax, impeached you and constantly smeared and lied about you in the media

- You remember that anarchists and race hustlers unleashed months of riots and chaos in a possible domestic color revolution

- You remember that you offered National Guard troops on J6 but the offer was denied by Nancy Pelosi and Muriel Bowser

- You remember that you said just hours before to peacefully and patriotically march

- You remember everything you’d given up in your previous life to be hated, attacked, and vilified by the DC snakes, insiders, and elitists

- Your own VP just fist-bumped Nancy Pelosi inside the Capitol

- You realize the entire DC cabal has conspired and plotted to hand the White House to a puppet they could control

Is it any wonder why Trump might have been a little upset on J6?

He wasn’t responsible for what happened despite what the media says. It was four years of lying, cheating, and betrayal by those who wanted to get Trump at all costs.

Nevertheless, he gathered himself and released a video telling people to go home—an act the illegitimate J6 Committee tried to criminalize.

Then they impeached him again.

Despite all of it, he’s decided to come back to retake the White House and finish what he started, a decision that provoked Biden’s DOJ to indict him multiple times for 700 years in federal prison.

Who else could endure what Donald Trump has?

The passion of the Donald :laugh:
 
Journalists are entitled to their opinions, especially if they report what their conclusions are as THEIR conclusions.

Besides that, assuming that they are in a position to get conclusive evidence before making claims is absurd. They are not gods, they are not the FBI or the courts with subpoena power. They are little more than glorified bloggers.

Which is to say that so long as they do not misrepresent the evidence they are presenting, to demand that it be conclusive before they share it is grossly irrational. People would never be able to report anything if this was the standard journalists attempted to operate by. And if any source of information would presume to tell you otherwise, that's a RED FLAG that they are a propaganda outfit attempting to lull you into letting them think for you.
By know you should know how conclusive evidence works.

If it's against somebody unpopular, the bar is so high that an ant may cross the bar without stumbling.

If it's against somebody popular, not even Voyager has reached that high ...
 
Quotes published in books prior to the internet still ok with you, I presume?

:whistling:

Do you realise what EADC just did?

It's a fabulous, most brilliant own goal! Totally clueless.

The very quote of Orwell that he says shouldn't be believed is saying exactly what he is doing.
Orwell wrote those very words, but EADC is saying you must reject the evidence of your eyes and ears :laugh:
 
By know you should know how conclusive evidence works.

If it's against somebody unpopular, the bar is so high that an ant may cross the bar without stumbling.

If it's against somebody popular, not even Voyager has reached that high ...
Something something Russiagate something. :sneaky:
 

79 Minutes: the Breach of the Capitol (Full Documentary)​

"79 Minutes: the Breach of the Capitol" takes the viewer from the initial breach of the Capitol Grounds to the breach of the actual Capitol building over an hour later.

X4ZPHsxq

The film examines the particular perspectives of various individuals and groups present on that day - how certain protesters turned violent while many stayed peaceful, how police leadership failed in preparations and strategy, how police who held a tactical advantage retreated repeatedly, how some police escalated unnecessarily, and ultimately how the defense of the capitol failed and allowed protesters to flow uninhibited into the US Capitol building.


Direct link & timeline synopsis also available here:

 

J6: A True Timeline gives the audience a never-before-seen timestamped blueprint for the events of January 6, 2021, as they unfolded in real time.

No other film to date fills the gaps or tells the story chronologically the way this film does.

The film is also different from anything produced to date because a small group of protestors, some who are J6 defendants, have been the ones to collect hours of footage to help contextualize the events of the day.

The film was funded and produced entirely through small donations and tens of thousands of volunteer man hours. The hope is that the film will provoke all Americans to be more curious about the true timeline of January 6.

Direct link available here:

 
Yes.

He was fired.... for doing something other than he had been, up until that point.
More like, he was doing exactly the things he had always done, and that finally caught up with Fox.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...fox-news-firing-condition-dominion-settlement

“They agreed to take me off the air, my show off the air, as a condition of the Dominion settlement,” Carlson tells his biographer, Chadwick Moore. “They had to settle this; Rupert [Murdoch, the 92-year-old Fox News owner] couldn’t testify. I think that deal was made minutes before the trial started.

“I mean, I know it was.”

According to its publisher, All Seasons Press, Moore’s book – called Tucker - is based on “hundreds of hours interviews with Carlson, his family, colleagues, acquaintances and enemies”. It will be published in the US on 1 August. The Guardian obtained a copy.

But hey, if you want to believe that he suddenly grew a conscience and that is why he was fired, go right ahead. :rolleyes:
 
More like, he was doing exactly the things he had always done, and that finally caught up with Fox.
But hey, if you want to believe that he suddenly grew a conscience and that is why he was fired, go right ahead. :rolleyes:
As you may recall - from a day ago, a whole 24 hrs - refining one's view is a process.

I'm happy to change my view in the light of any new information.

My impression was that he did more or less find the courage to stop being just a useful tool of the establishment's co-opted press. That it didn't sit well with him, that his entire career would go down as 'Obedient cog, and talking head'. More so with the radicalization of the political spectrum in shifting left.

So, if there is an alternate case to be made i.e. that he was always anti-establishment, I'm all ears.

p.s. I still think he is not nearly anti-establishment enough, being on the right-wing, but that is perhaps a separate discussion.
 
Yes.

He was fired.... for doing something other than he had been, up until that point.
He was fired because Fox cared more about screwing over Trump than they did about money. Fox's lawyers said the case was easily winnable (duh). But settling the case and then using it to claim that the allegations are beyond the pale was much more useful to the establishment.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X