Current Affairs section bans

I recall it was mentioned in the 'should we reopen the Gaza thread' discussion.

Perhaps I misunderstood, in which case I stand corrected.
 
R13 is correct... Read the OP again

Hi there

Many people are asking why they were banned out of this section. The reason in basically all the cases are: There were many complaints about your posts in this forum, and section ban was therefore requested.

A section ban is seen as a way to avoid multiple infringements, which may result in a full forum ban. We always want to avoid banning a member, and a section ban is hence a far better way to deal with this situation.

I can definitely understand that this is not pleasant to have your rights revoked in a certain section. However, we tried other options in the past and they did not work.
 
Yoh!!! A lot of wet nappies that need changing around the moaning and groaning.
 
To add another opinion I think the banning issue is 100% correct when it is warranted e.g. someone has been warned and they repeatedly ignore the warnings, or as has been the case, creating multiple usernames. I was banned yesterday because Gary thought I was someone else just using a different user name (we sorted it out eventually and I understand why he thought so). My suggestion is for everyone just to cool down and not be so quick to judge someone's posts or intentions, both forum users as well as 'mods'.

This entire issue of banning comes from the Israel/Gaza thread situation and it's become such a hot and emotional thread. It seems people want to jump down everyone's throats at every turn before even properly reading the posts. You guys are questioning the meaning behind users posts midway through reading it because you are so in a hurry to rebuke or debunk it.

Marine1 and Seriously (just using you guys as examples please don't take it personally) sometimes say things which might be extremely offensive to some people, but others do that to them as well. This is a public forum and when you decide to participate in a thread which you know will provoke emotional posts you really should be prepared for the worst.

In essence lets stop complaning and if there is a bias as some are claiming then accept that it is not going to change if it did not change by now.
 
If only they allowed me to use one of these as endorsed by Odin,

BAN-HAMMER.jpg
 
i would suggest an outright ban of, say 7 days.
at present, when banned from CA they simply go over to OT and post there.
 
i would suggest an outright ban of, say 7 days.
at present, when banned from CA they simply go over to OT and post there.

Exactly. And "subtly" moan about it. Play the ball, not the man.

Also warnings should be given for those baiting personal attacks as well. This too is a problem.
 
How do I know if I have a section ban?

EDIT: now I know
 
Last edited:
To add another opinion I think the banning issue is 100% correct when it is warranted e.g. someone has been warned and they repeatedly ignore the warnings, or as has been the case, creating multiple usernames. I was banned yesterday because Gary thought I was someone else just using a different user name (we sorted it out eventually and I understand why he thought so). My suggestion is for everyone just to cool down and not be so quick to judge someone's posts or intentions, both forum users as well as 'mods'.

This entire issue of banning comes from the Israel/Gaza thread situation and it's become such a hot and emotional thread. It seems people want to jump down everyone's throats at every turn before even properly reading the posts. You guys are questioning the meaning behind users posts midway through reading it because you are so in a hurry to rebuke or debunk it.

Marine1 and Seriously (just using you guys as examples please don't take it personally) sometimes say things which might be extremely offensive to some people, but others do that to them as well. This is a public forum and when you decide to participate in a thread which you know will provoke emotional posts you really should be prepared for the worst.

In essence lets stop complaning and if there is a bias as some are claiming then accept that it is not going to change if it did not change by now.

I agree. People are too quick to complain and report posts.
Debate is good as long as it doesn't get violent
 
How do I know if I have a section ban?

You have to meet one more more of the following requirements:

1. Be an extremist.
2. Support unpopular views.
3. Moan / whine about popular views.
4. You don't know right people.
5. Talking to spirits.
 
You have to meet one more more of the following requirements:

1. Be an extremist.
2. Support unpopular views.
3. Moan / whine about popular views.
4. You don't know right people.
5. Talking to spirits.

Aah. Guilty of no 5
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X