How many people don't understand their account, put too much money in?
Certainly looks like intentional confusion..
Payment processed a few days ago, now got a future-use credit balance of R58 (confirmed by statements, which run late naturally).
Will cover R29 due 16 April.
Will cover R29 due 16 May.
Will only need to pay more in by 16 June.
Yet... we get this kind of misleading wording, and weird representation of the balance:
(BTW, minus sign for a positive balance is normal practice.)
View attachment 1679391
View attachment 1679393
So for those who still don't know after all these years;
They're reflecting the balance that will be due (not the actual balance), and only due in about 26 days time.
After deduction on 16 April it will say R0.
Edit: This is the important one - gives the first impression that the account is empty, something already then due, yet there's still nearly 2 full months' credit available.
After deduction on 16 May it will say R29, finally correct re an amount being due, but only due a month later.
Edit: Why say something is due when nothing is due? Why claim 25 viewing days left when that's a huge shortfall of the actual period paid for? Why are management likely to claim again if challenged that it's just a misunderstanding / oversight.... decades later??
