South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Because that is not the nature of ppl, they always need something to complain about.
I thought the Sharks last try was suspicious. Looked like two movements while the guy was in a tackle.
Before or after Uli Schmidt nearly killed Tony?Sweet revenge for 1990 ... Tony Watson ... Loftus ... Eina ... but sweet!
Did Steve Walsh rob the Sharks? Nope the Sharks chucked it away!![]()
Can you prove that he cost the Sharks the match with pics or videos of the knock-on? That's the whole point of this thread, not to badmouth each others' teams but to see if the ref made an error or not.
I would think that he did not hear the siren. That is the second time it's happened there. First time with the Crusaders. Makes one think maybe the siren is not loud enough.Nevermind the conversion, if Steyn simply kicked out [instead of kicking it straight back to the bulls] right there at the end, Sharks would've won.
I would think that he did not hear the siren. That is the second time it's happened there. First time with the Crusaders. Makes one think maybe the siren is not loud enough.
Spoken like a man. To be a worthy winner one has to learn to be gracious in defeat.It was a particularly galling to lose after the Sharks had scored that try with 3 minutes to go. Unfortunatley the score is on the board and us Sharks fans must be sporting about it and congratulate all those Bulls supporters whom we tried to outdo last week with our mean jokes and threats of a hiding.
I get solace from the fact that 1. an SA team won the S14 for the first time ever and 2. we live to fight another day.
If Steve Walsh lost it for the Sharks, then I was at a different game.
Maybe some flashing lights would be in order then. Ground has to do something as they lost the final because of it.You could not hear the siren, I think a freight train going through center of the field would have been muted with that crowd.
Call me cynical, call me sour grapes, call me whatever you like,.
First off, let's explain the rules to those Bulls fans who can't tell the difference between a double movement and placing the ball:
A double movement is when the player scoring moves his entire body to score whilst still being held in a tackle. Placing the ball when held in a tackle is perfectly legal and that's how Albert scored the try.
Second off, let's examine the last two minutes so that the Bulls supporters (who we all know are not the sharpest crayons in the box) can understand why we do indeed have sour grapes about what I can only call highway robbery:
Error #1: A forward pass from Bull to Bull on the far side. Touch judge doesn't see it, nor does the ref.
Error#2: A ruck forms on the near side, Sharks are in possession. The referee doesn't call a ruck when clearly there is one. Bulls hands are in the ruck and "surprise-surpise" it emerges on the Bulls side where...
Error#3: occurs and Habana (who should have been sent off in the first minute) knocks it on, unseen by our friend Walsh, and proceeds to score a try.
Error#4: Dumbass kicker from Loftus gets a second chance to kick the winning conversion when Sharks players have managed to reach him for a charge down after he moves. What does the ref do? He lets him carry on.
Call me cynical, call me sour grapes, call me whatever you like, but to lose a final like that is unfair. As far as I am concerned the Super 14 Champions are the Sharks, regardless of what the scoreboard says.
Steve Walsh should be banned from the game for life for making that many errors in a crucial final.