saksakgp
Expert Member
Yes Riax continue justifying greed. Tell us more about your "project worth over a couple billion rand"
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Exactly. You cut yourself or you injure yourself they aren't going to treat you for free. I think its kind of idiotic that one expects this..........
l
Now lets look at consumables. There is a cost of paper, film (for xrays), CDs (advanced radiology), gloves, syringes, needles, blades ect ect ... again not free
Ok now support staff. A secretary to make appointments and deal with medical aid for you. Internet costs. Telephone and fax cost.
Which specialist has an MRI in his rooms? As far as I can recall those kinds of machinery belong to the hospital. From the few times I was in hospital it appeared that all these expensive machinery were communal and each doctor had access to it.Its not like the GP has an MRI in his rooms. His equipment doesnt cost R15 million and doesnt have a running cost.
This isnt a hard concept to understand.
Law. Calling out a labour advocate will set you back R10 000
Which specialist has an MRI in his rooms? As far as I can recall those kinds of machinery belong to the hospital. From the few times I was in hospital it appeared that all these expensive machinery were communal and each doctor had access to it.
The last time I had anything done like this and I check the doctor's bill they charged for the needles, gloves, film etc.
Who expected them to do it for free, they have her medical aid info and billing address
she said that the injection and few stitches they gave her amounted to almost R6000 . Is that right, that doesn't sound right?
RiaX, with the comparison you make with Windows and Smart TV's the difference there is if I don't get what I pay for I can go get my money back
Yes Riax continue justifying greed.
Oscar's bail defence reportedly cost R700 000 for four days. That's a cost of R175 000 a day for his attorney and senior counsel.
THE private health-care sector was wasteful and its excessive pricing could lead to further shrinking of benefits if costs continued to escalate, Lord Nigel Crisp, a member of the UK House of Lords and a board member of the South African Department of Health’s Academy for Leadership in Management of Healthcare, said in Boston last week.
Crisp said in his experience with South Africa’s private health-care sector, he believed it was “quite wasteful”.
“There is over-treatment, excessive pricing and it’s very hospital focused,” he said.
Crisp said he knew South Africa’s big medical funders, such as Discovery Health, were not convinced the current tariffs levied by private health-care providers were the best they could offer.
“In context, I think your private sector could be cheaper.”
Crisp said one of the underlying problems was that specialists who conducted more complicated treatment of diseases were paid the most and more resources were allocated to treatment processes than prevention programmes.
The South African health-care system mimicked that of the US, which was characterised by large use of the private sector and private health insurance.
But South Africa was worse off because the private sector catered for very few people, he said.
Over-treatment cost the US health-care system between $158 billion (R1.4 trillion) and $226bn in 2011.
Excessive health-care prices were estimated to cost between $84bn and $178bn in that same year. Total waste under all categories, including failure to co-ordinate care, excess administration costs and other things, was estimated between $558bn and $1.2 trillion. Crisp said that the level of waste in Africa was in the region of 30 percent of this.
He said failure to co-ordinate care in countries such as South Africa meant that when patients used different doctors, there was duplication of tests carried out.
“There is the same level of waste in Africa, different kinds of waste,” said Crisp, adding that the lack of maintenance and inability to operate equipment, particularly in the public sector, added a significant cost to the countries’ health-care budgets without realising the matching health-care outcomes.
South Africa spends a higher proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) on health care than most of its Brics counterparts of Brazil, Russia, India and China. Only Brazil spends more.
In 2011, total spend on health was about 8.3 percent of GDP, way above the 5 percent recommended by the World Health Organisation. However, South Africa scores worse on indicators such as its maternal mortality rate and tuberculosis.
Crisp said there were problems in both the public and the private sectors and it was up to the country’s leadership to make the right decisions that would see the two sectors come together to form a solid health-care system.
“You’ve got a lot of ingredients that are not quite in the right place at the moment,” he said, looking at the areas that needed to be fixed to facilitate the implementation of the National Health Insurance next year.
Crisp said like many other African states and the US, South Africa was training health professionals for the 20th century, a mistake that the UK wished it could have avoided when it made its transition to the National Health System.
The other mistake that South Africa would have to avoid was confusing health care with social care, especially among the elderly, as this was one of the factors that pushed up health-care costs in the UK.
Novartis sponsored Londiwe Buthelezi’s trip to Boston.
so you expect them to pay for you ? my GP doesnt charge me for needles when I go and most likely you talking utter nonsense please show the bill where you where charged for needles and consumables for visiting a doctor in consultation. A consultation is not the same as admission to a hospital.
I think all of you complaining about cost of a doctor please tell me what exactly you do because I believe you being greedy and deserve a 50% salary decrease.
I have given reasons, I have given examples. When docs start charging 3 to 5 times or more over the scheme limit that is greed. .
Right there.
You are wrong.
What gives you the right to decide what is greed?
The doctor decides what he charges, if your medical aid scheme rate is x and the doctor charges 20x. Then go see another doctor.
The whole problem is a medical aid decides that a doctors time is worth 400 rand a consult.
The doctor thinks his time is worth R2000 an hour.
If no one goes to said doctor he will have to reduce his fees.
I am a stay at home mom so salary (money) wise I get paid fsck all! My wife is a public high school teacher for the Gauteng Department of Education which you know pays over the top salaries, Yeah! We are living life big time on that salary. I would not have it any other way though, we do just fine on her salary and the time with my son is more valuable than anything I own or could ever own.
Well with that being said, here is an article of relevance in today's edition of Business Report:
Govt need to purchase drugs in bulk at cheaper prices, they need to legislate cheap drugs for certain conditions (HIV etc)
Some surgeons charge surgeon's fees of around R 20 K per hour for surgery.
My urologist was almost 20k to remove one kidney stone.
So? If I've got someone slicing around my brain with a sharp scalpel then 10k vs 20k is pretty meaningless to me... Sure it'll put a significant dent in my savings, but no more than a cut in the wrong place.Some surgeons charge surgeon's fees of around R 20 K per hour for surgery.