Documentaries

NoStepOnSnek88 said:
Easy to discredit something, just because you have no knowledge of the subject or understanding, and then further discrediting it without actually watching it and see what evidence they have on the subject matter?
Click to expand...
It was aimed at the other poster you twat
 
NoStepOnSnek88 said:
You still haven't answered the question.
Click to expand...
settled.png


Now...

jack-sparrow-shoo.gif
 
rambo919 said:
It raises some interesting possibilities but the new age religious nature of the narrative discredits it.
Click to expand...

Trailer doens't give much away but the sensationlist stamemnts like "it would end poverty overnight" is a red flag. Anyone here watched it and can report if its worth it from an objetive porspective ?
 
L-Dog said:
Trailer doens't give much away but the sensationlist stamemnts like "it would end poverty overnight" is a red flag. Anyone here watched it and can report if its worth it from an objetive porspective ?
Click to expand...
That rests on the assumption that all you really need to end poverty is cheap or free energy..... which in itself is faulty but understandable given the historical corrolation with cheaper energy and material wealth increase. They give many examples of such energy actually being suppressed by governments which itself is very true.

The presenter points out the "Gollum effect" where the inventor thinks if he can patent it he can get rich... it's his PRECIOUS..... but then shortly after he attempts to patent it it gets either bought up and mothballed with non disclosure agreements or rejected and he mysteriously dies. The solution being to open source it so it can spread like wildfire and be unsupressable.... but no one is ever not too greedy to do that. This has been going on since Edison.

While I agree that governments use expensive energy to control their populations..... I can also see the immense danger that these reportedly suppressed sometimes very high energy alternatives pose..... just imagine whole cities evaporating because of unregulated use nvm potential atmospheric disasters..... mankind is still WAY too immature for that kind of power.
 
Cray said:
settled.png


Now...

jack-sparrow-shoo.gif
Click to expand...
It's very clear you haven't watched it, nor did you read the synopsis of the documentary.
You comment without having any knowledge on the subject matter, and then immediately shut it down without even taking a look at it, to establish what evidence is there to support their claims and research.
 
NoStepOnSnek88 said:
It's very clear you haven't watched it, nor did you read the synopsis of the documentary.
You comment without having any knowledge on the subject matter, and then immediately shut it down without even taking a look at it, to establish what evidence is there to support their claims and research.
Click to expand...
You mean.... he completely missed that it's not about UFO's? shocking.....
 
L-Dog said:
Trailer doens't give much away but the sensationlist stamemnts like "it would end poverty overnight" is a red flag. Anyone here watched it and can report if its worth it from an objetive porspective ?
Click to expand...
Definitely worth a watch, however you need to keep a very open mind when watching it.
This is most definitely not a mainstream subject matter nor is it well funded or researched.
 
NoStepOnSnek88 said:
It's very clear you haven't watched it, nor did you read the synopsis of the documentary.
Click to expand...

A century of illegal UFO secrecy has cost humanity hundreds of years of spiritual, cultural and technological development.
Click to expand...

This is what I read from your post, and I stand by my initial reaction. Does the movie have any solid evidence to back up Greer's claims about the existence of Flying Saucers?


NoStepOnSnek88 said:
You comment without having any knowledge on the subject matter,
Click to expand...
I think you need to learn the difference between commenting and reacting.

NoStepOnSnek88 said:
and then immediately shut it down without even taking a look at it, to establish what evidence is there to support their claims and research.
Click to expand...
I also tend to dismiss people who claim to have seen Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster, don't take it personally mate. Sh*tty movies about UFOs presenting zero evidence are all over the place, at least the Ancient Aliens series showcased some cool archeological sites before it went into the weeds.

Does this movie make a compelling case in your view?
 
Cray said:
This is what I read from your post, and I stand by my initial reaction. Does the movie have any solid evidence to back up Greer's claims about the existence of Flying Saucers?



I think you need to learn the difference between commenting and reacting.


I also tend to dismiss people who claim to have seen Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster, don't take it personally mate. Sh*tty movies about UFOs presenting zero evidence are all over the place, at least the Ancient Aliens series showcased some cool archeological sites before it went into the weeds.

Does this movie make a compelling case in your view?
Click to expand...
The documentary is not about UFOs
And you are really delusional if you still comparing UFOs to Bigfoot.
Maybe you haven't been following, there's a lot of evidence out now.
Did you ever see that there was an official release by the US Navy and Pentagon.

I'm sure YouTube has separate videos as well of all three (3) incidents namely
Tic Tac, GoFast and Gimbal. That is the best Surveillance evidence
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X