DSL192...got it yesterday

cemt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
372
Reaction score
1
Location
Sandton
Hi all, I've got my adsl192 installed yesterday, using normal 3gb telkom account, used dsl512 for over a year and difference in speeds are unnoticable. Using Dc++ and net-transport, download acc 8. And my machine f's off! getting between 70-90k not bad, not bad at all...

Intel Celeron 2.4D
ECS Mainboard 800Mhz
512MB Hynix 400DDR
36Gb Raptor 10000rpm
80Gb Maxtor 7200rpm
 
ull get more speed in the beginning, telkom seems to make the actually changes only a week or so later.
 
I suspected this would be the case - based on HomeDSL384 peeps saying that there isn't much diff between HomeDSL384 & HomeDSL512 in speed.

Now you know why I recommended that people go for HomeDSL192 first - bcos I suspected that Telkomonopoly don't yet have a system in place (other than contention ratios) to lower the speed from 512Kbps to 384Kbps or 192Kbps.
 
When did you apply for the service??

This was pretty quick if you ask me.

:)
 
applied for dsl384 in novemeber 2004

but downgraded last week monday before they installed
 
I did notice the "70-90k" & I decided not to comment on the possible inflation thereof when I posted before, however I suggest that cemt does as RPM has asked - run the BBST & other speed tests.

cemt, when you say "70-90k" do you mean KBytes/s or Kbits/s?
 
Last edited:
If I understood correctly the downgrade was done on the order before the installation was done, yes?

In which case a downgrade charge greater than R0.00000000001 would've been a hard for Telkomonopoly to charge via their billing system.

The downgrade charge on an existing ADSL rental is ~R265 (was R250 last year).
 
Remembering that this is Telkomonopoly we are talking about (so I religiously add the word ALLEGEDLY to everything :eek: ), according to Telkomonopoly orcs you pay R0.00 to upgrade your ADSL speed rental, but actually your monthly rental increases (as we know), however no additional ripoff 1nce-off upgrade fee ;).
 
Well I can say I had 65kb - 75kb upload speeds the first few days when I got my adsl 384k but 90kb is pushing it. :)
 
Alkine said:
Well I can say I had 65kb - 75kb upload speeds the first few days when I got my adsl 384k but 90kb is pushing it. :)
What are we talking about here kilo-bits or kilo-Bytes?
 
test results

Dan Elwell's Broadband Speed Test (unregistered)
Speed Test Report 05/03/05 00:46 - Full test

Test conducted at: 2005/03/05 12:46:25 AM
Test sequence: Full test

Please note that these results are a snapshot of this particular moment. Run the test a few times to ensure maximum accuracy. Although the test has been constructed to be highly accurate, no guarantees can be made to the level of accuracy experienced in everyday use.

Test 1: Ping times to UK servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 50 ms (lower is better)

linx.net: 404.7 ms
clara.net: 405 ms
cardiff.ac.uk: 405 ms
london.gov.uk: 404.7 ms

This result shows serious problems with your ping times, and should be investigated.

Test 2: Ping times to European servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 30 ms (lower is better)

univ-rennes1.fr: 498 ms
sunet.se: 431 ms
uvsq.fr: 493 ms
tu-berlin.de: 420 ms

This result shows serious problems with your ping times, and should be investigated.

Test 3: Ping times to east-coast USA servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 120 ms (lower is better)

mirror.cc.vt.edu: 420.8 ms
club.cc.cmu.edu: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
mirror.nocservices.com: 410 ms
rutgers.edu: 499 ms

This result shows serious problems with your ping times, and should be investigated.

Test 4: Ping times to west-coast USA servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 160 ms (lower is better)

stanford.edu: 483 ms
ucla.edu: 487 ms
stanford.edu: 484.8 ms
cybertrails.com: 502.8 ms

This result shows serious problems with your ping times, and should be investigated.

Test 5: Ping times to east Asia servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 300 ms (lower is better)

meisei-u.ac.jp: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
opensourcecommunity.ph: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
meisei-u.ac.jp: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
zentek-international.com: 493.7 ms

The results of this test indicate no problems.

Test 6: Ping times to Australian servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 350 ms (lower is better)

apache.inspire.net.nz: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
bondinet.com: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
apache.planetmirror.com.au: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
froggy.com.au: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.

Too many server errors occurred therefore this test is inconclusive.

Test 7: Ping times to central Asian servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 300 ms (lower is better)

opensourcecommunity.ph: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
oynasana.com: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.
apache.officepark.ru: 467.3 ms
apache.officepark.ru: 467 ms

The results of this test indicate no problems.

Test 8: Download speeds from UK servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 192 Kb/s (higher is better)

mirrorservice.org: 422 Kb/s

The results of this test indicate no problems.

Test 9: Download speeds from European servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 192 Kb/s (higher is better)

cvut.cz: 363 Kb/s

The results of this test indicate no problems.

Test 10: Download speeds from east-coast USA servers

Ideally, you should get a result of around 192 Kb/s (higher is better)

reverse.net: This test failed due to a server timeout or other error.

Too many server errors occurred therefore this test is inconclusive.

Test 12: Packet loss en route to a UK server

Ideally, you should get a result of around 0 % (lower is better)

linx.net: 24 %
zeniiia.linux.org.uk: 6 %

An unacceptable level of packet loss has been detected which should be investigated.

Test 13: Packet loss en route to a European server

Ideally, you should get a result of around 0 % (lower is better)

eu.uu.net: 24 %
sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch: 20 %

An unacceptable level of packet loss has been detected which should be investigated.

Test 14: Packet loss en route to an east-coast USA server

Ideally, you should get a result of around 0 % (lower is better)

the-city.seas.upenn.edu: 24 %
helios.dii.utk.edu: 26 %

An unacceptable level of packet loss has been detected which should be investigated.

End of testing.

This report was collated using Dan Elwell's Broadband Speed Test. For more information or to download, please visit www.broadbandspeedtest.net.

Generated 2005/03/05 12:46:26 AM
 
Ok thanks cemt, just wondering if the speeds were consistently higher than 192Kbits/s, and how many test runs did you do?

Also, I wonder if the reason for the higher than 192Kbits/s speed is purely due to a low contention on HomeDSL192...

PS: Suggestion - use the exe & registration code that RPM posted in the announcements forum & schedule BBST to run automatically for the duration of the test period - you can get it to automatically email the scheduled test run result to RPM - more info in RPM's thread :).
 
it is much slower today....i never paid to downgrade as i did it before they installed yesterday
 
cemt said:
it is much slower today....i never paid to downgrade as i did it before they installed yesterday
Well we do know that Telkomonopoly watches MyADSL very closely (e.g. the whole MyADSL rated HomeDSL384 best marketing thing on Telkom.co.za), so would it be too much of a leap to think Telkomonopoly saw your post & decided to decrease your speed so people would signup for HomeDSL512 instead...the bandwidth illuminati conspiracy theory takes shape...:D
 
to be honest, even if 192k give similar speeds to 384k... Id rather stick with 384k as the price/performance by standard and secure the bandwidth before telkom fix something and all your happiness dissapears.

Thats just me :D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X