South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
This is not good at all, one can only assume that the EASSy cable is not running according to the schedule the EASSy consortium set for itself.To this the EASSy consortium merely replied that they do not wish to comment on these questions at this time.
Highly unlikely. All hidden behind closed agreements – that is if they actually know exactly what is happening. We will do our best to find out though@rpm, maybe one or more of the South African shareholders in the EASSy cable consortium will be willing to comment...?
Doesn't surprise me that EASSy has a closed door policy considering that Telkodemonopolies is an EASSy shareholder AFAIK, and we all know how secretive the SAT-3 bandwidth illuminati consortium is with Telkodemonopolies at its helm...Highly unlikely. All hidden behind closed agreements – that is if they actually know exactly what is happening. We will do our best to find out though![]()
Hmmm what NEPAD cable(s)? - AFAIK there has been no news about the NEPAD submarine cable for about 2 or 3 months - all went dead quiet after SEACOM and EASSy said they were going full steam ahead - I suspect that Poison Ivy & Stalin-Mafole have quietly scrapped the whole idea.I reckon Dept. of Constipation will spin this as vindication for pulling out of EASSy and further motivation for the Nepad cables.
All hail the edit buttonThat's kinda cool that u managed to quote a post before it was posted, ic![]()
Sadly we need both SEACOM and EASSy to inject some much needed international bandwidth competition and redundancy as well as lower latency to some locations.Seacom FTW!!!
(that's the most constructive i can get after midnight)