F1 2023

Which team will take constructors in 2023?


  • Total voters
    179
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
MCL60 vs MCL36

1093xi0770ia1.jpg

Apart from the large chrome branding, no major changes on the livery. The underfloor see some change, and the gills at the back of the side pod quite a big change.

Overall i still like the way this car looks.
 
Ferrari launch their 2023 challenger today at 12:25 (SA time) from their base at Maranello

 
So boring.

I hope Merc go with the black livery this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shi
Gary Anderson: Ferrari has innovations the FIA might query: https://the-race.com/formula-1/ferr...-ferrari-has-innovations-the-fia-might-query/

"
image0-2.jpeg


... Together with these vanes (magenta ellipse on image above) turning airflow outboard, Ferrari has been focusing on maximising outwash. This is something these regulations have strived to minimise so I would expect the FIA to be taking a close look at these vanes.

There is a question over the legality of the vanes that I’ve highlighted in the magenta ellipse in how they join the third and fourth wing flaps.

Mercedes arrived at the United States Grand Prix last year with the solution below but had to remove the brackets at the behest of the FIA. The geometry of the vanes must have been within what was allowed by the regulations otherwise Mercedes would not have tried it, so the officials’ judgement would have been based on the vanes’ intent and purpose. The regulation for the use of anything like this was rewritten for this year to limit the quantity, the overall size and the curvature of these components.

I can only assume that what Ferrari has put on the car complies with the letter of these new regulations. You can see that the three outer ones are a little different relative to the inner two, so it looks like Ferrari is trying get over this regulation by saying they are being used for different purposes. Good luck with that.

As well as complying with the regulations, there’s always the question of what’s called ‘primary purpose’. So if there’s something on the car that is legal and ostensibly for one reason – in this case maintaining the slot gap – but the FIA believes it’s for another – for example aerodynamic gain – then you can hit trouble.

Getting as much of the tyre squirt as possible to go outboard is critical to the amount of turbulence the front tyre generates. If it comes inboard it will generate a negative effect on the airflow at the leading edge of the sidepods and underfloor.

image1-2.jpeg


The front suspension is a pushrod-driven inner damper (yellow highlight) with a spring or torsion bar supporting the car. The wishbone pick-ups where they join the chassis (green highlight) have a small amount of anti-squat/anti-lift on them to help support the front of the car and reduce the ride height change when the loads are changing under braking.

The steering track rod (magenta highlight) is low down in front of, but slightly higher than, the forward leg of the lower front wishbone.
It’s interesting to see how much curvature there is on the upper surface of the forward leg of the top wishbone. There is a regulation of a 3.5:1 ratio to control this and normally this component would be a simple symmetrical aerodynamic profile. But it looks like Ferrari has generated more of a one-sided aerodynamic profile, a bit like an upside down wing. This is optimised to control the airflow coming off the trailing edge of the front wing and realign it as well as possible to improve the performance of the leading edge of the sidepod.

The rear suspension is pushrod operated, very similar in layout to last year. But the forward leg of the top wishbone inboard mounting looks like it is mounted a little lower, giving more anti-lift to reduce the rear ride-height change under braking.

The actual body profile in the coke bottle area – where the body narrows towards the rear tyres – is a little more bulbous, taking up some of the coke bottle opening. This is one area that varies dramatically on the Ferrari from the other cars we have already seen, and I’m not sure I am a fan of this solution."
 
Front suspension biggest change on SF-23 F1 car - Ferrari: https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/front-suspension-biggest-change-on-sf-23-f1-car-ferrari/10432018/

"... Asked to elaborate on the differences compared to last year's car he said: "The most obvious changes to the car are definitely in the area of the front suspension. where we have moved from a configuration with a high trackrod to one with a low trackrod, driven by the demands of the aerodynamics.

"The front wing is also different, as is the construction of the nose, as the primary element is no longer attached to the nose instead it is floating.

"The bodywork is more a continuation of what was done last year, but it's more extreme."

Like all teams, Ferrari has had to take into account the 15mm change to the floor height that was mandated by the FIA.

"The new era rules introduced by the FIA to reduce the risk of porpoising on track have led to a net loss of aerodynamic performance," said Cardile.

"Actually quite a substantial loss. In terms of development, our work was not much different to that of previous years. We simply had to adapt the car's geometry to suit the new flow shapes that are generated because of the new regulations."

Cardile made an interesting observation about the impact of the budget cap, noting that far more items were carried over from last year than would have been the case in the past, when teams did not face such restrictions. That was not the case in the transition from 2021 to 2022 due to the massive rule changes, and teams were obliged to redesign a lot of parts.

"The budget cap has had an undoubted effect on performance," he noted. "Therefore, when it came to designing this year's car, we had to take it into consideration.

"The way we went about it was to decide which areas of the car had little or no added value to the performance of the car, and then try and keep these areas of the car similar to those of the previous one.

"In numerical terms, it means the number of parts carried over in this year's car is double the figure of that of a car built to the previous regulations, without the presence of a budget cap." ..."

ferrari-sf-23-detail-suspensio-1.webp
 
Nice to see Red Bull in the lead with 54.9% votes for winning this year
#MAX4PRESIDENT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X