Jean Claude Vaaldamme
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2020
- Messages
- 8,027
- Reaction score
- 8,818
Nope the Sky Tv broadcast was only concentrating on a midfielder the whole race, did not see it.Did you see there were two Brits on the podium?
Nope the Sky Tv broadcast was only concentrating on a midfielder the whole race, did not see it.Did you see there were two Brits on the podium?
You realise the podium is after the race, right?Nope the Sky Tv broadcast was only concentrating on a midfielder the whole race, did not see it.
Ferrari, being Ferrari
![]()
I didn't understand the strategy either. Was that point really worth it? I would have rolled the dice. It might have come back nicely for the last few laps.i was really hoping lewis stayed out and navigated a little of the wet with those slicks
Was only dry on the racing line anyway. Overtaking off the line would have been tricky on slicks...I didn't understand the strategy either. Was that point really worth it? I would have rolled the dice. It might have come back nicely for the last few laps.
True, but a gamble that fans would have at least appreciated.Was only dry on the racing line anyway. Overtaking off the line would have been tricky on slicks...
True, but a gamble that fans would have at least appreciated.
Why notIn those instances would t it make sense to split the strat, pull one of the cars in for inters and leave the other on slicks?
Or in the case of experienced drivers like Hamilton rather let the driver make the call, he can read the track, the pit wall can't.In those instances would t it make sense to split the strat, pull one of the cars in for inters and leave the other on slicks?
It must be the water
Was only dry on the racing line anyway. Overtaking off the line would have been tricky on slicks...
TL;DRFIA issue strict flexi-wing action with Chinese GP TD: https://www.planetf1.com/news/fia-set-to-take-further-flexi-wing-action-at-chinese-grand-prix
"... Ahead of last weekend’s season-opening Australian Grand Prix, meanwhile, teams were informed of an update to Technical Directive TD034, instructing them to install a rear-facing housing to accommodate a camera for the FIA to monitor rear wing deflection in Friday’s practice sessions at Albert Park.
All cars were found to comply with the deflection limits in Australia.
However, the FIA has found ‘sufficient grounds’ for a ‘tougher test’ to be introduced at the second race of the season in China with a focus on the upper rear wing. ...
“Having analysed footage from the rear wing deformations combined to the static deflections measured inside the FIA garage in Melbourne, the FIA has concluded that sufficient grounds exist for a tougher test to be introduced from the forthcoming Chinese Grand Prix on the upper rear wing.
“More specifically, Article 3.15.17, introduced in 2025, states that if 75Kg of vertical load is applied on either extremity of the rear wing mainplane, the distance between the mainplane and the flap (also known as “slot gap”) must not vary by more than 2mm.
“From the forthcoming Grand Prix in Shanghai, this limit will be reduced to 0.5mm. Due to the short notice for Shanghai only a tolerance of 0.25mm will be added to this new limit.
“The Teams were informed of this revised test early Monday 17th of March.
“The FIA wishes to further confirm that during the Melbourne event all cars tested against the requirements of Article 3.15.17 and found to comply, therefore all cars raced in Melbourne were deemed to be legal.”"
Yep, McLaren are defos the target with this TDTL;DR
Our current tests in the pitlane = all cars pass. Footage from rear facing camera's still show excessive mini-DRS movement, therefore the pitlane test will be stricter and allow for even less movement.
Seeing Mclaren's name being thrown around A LOT in regards to this new TD....
At least we now know why they call the Cockpit "The Tub"