Charlie.
Well-Known Member
Plug Shapes, wires and voltages aside, RJ-45 and USB aren't related in any way. Even believing that such a "USB to RJ45" device *exists* shows a complete lack of understanding of the purposes for each type of connection. RJ-45 normally implies Ethernet. Ethernet connects network stations. These (probably) feature a TCP-IP stack and run some software that communicates with other stations using some fancy protocol. USB connects a computer to a device. The computer runs device-specific software, called a driver, that knows how to use the USB connection to talk to the device. USB bears only one relation to any kind of network medium: it supports device-chaining. All similarities end there.
The only way to expose a USB device over a network would be to create a box that has USB ports, RJ-45 ports and enough operating system to run the device's drivers and a network server to provide the devices functionality to other stations.
This is why USB print *servers* are called servers. They run an operating system (perhaps busybox), run the printer's drivers and act as a print server.
Without a "Neotel phone server" black-box device, USB to Ethernet just aint viable.
The only way to expose a USB device over a network would be to create a box that has USB ports, RJ-45 ports and enough operating system to run the device's drivers and a network server to provide the devices functionality to other stations.
This is why USB print *servers* are called servers. They run an operating system (perhaps busybox), run the printer's drivers and act as a print server.
Without a "Neotel phone server" black-box device, USB to Ethernet just aint viable.