in the secon place, voda knows bout the hole, and thus, could have stopped it a long time ago, BUT apparently they are making more money of the vlive portal in the form of sales than what they lose with the abusers. WHY else didnt they stop it a long time ago?
Let me explain. (and you can take my word on this)
There are two APN's, most people use:
1) internet: This is used for all internet-based work and you pay your specific rate per Mb.
2) Vlive: This is used to browse and download stuff from the VLive portal. You don't pay for any data, only the stuff you actually buy.
The problem came in with handsets that work with a primary apn. Most phones are now configured with the VLive apn and the moment you go 'off-net' you should actually switch over to the internet apn. But many phones can't do this. To expect the bulk of users to do this manually would be unfair and would swamp the call-desk.
The correct resolution (from a network perspective) is to either:
1) Allow off-net browsing via VLive but to bill for it. This required specialised development which takes time.
2) Blanket block Vlive to go off-net and expect customers to switch apn's if they want to go off-net. This is very easy from a network perspective, but would be inconvenient for subscribers.
We decided to go with option one and allow off-net browsing. To be quite honest (and yes, we were very, very naive), we did not expect the kind of abuse that happened, with people setting up sim farms, etc. Or selling the information for personal gain.
So, the answer is very simple, to ensure as best possible experience for Vodacom subscribers, we decided to allow (a limited amount of) off-net browsing. I, for one, was all for it....won't make this mistake again.
The systems are now in place.
Soulcode, on the point of logging all usage. If your usage is not logged, how the heck do you get a bill every month. Or can ask for a detailed bill from 6 months ago.
Go figure.....IT-101......