Praeses
Executive Member
Is the windows 7 beta able to run (properly) on netbooks? It was slower than Vista on a P4 notebook with 512MB of memory in my case. Installed the normal 32bit version. Is there a version specific for netbooks then?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Is the windows 7 beta able to run (properly) on netbooks? It was slower than Vista on a P4 notebook with 512MB of memory in my case. Installed the normal 32bit version. Is there a version specific for netbooks then?
Well the figure that's floating on the web is that Win7 (Vista SP2) is 20-30% slower than XP. If your hardware flies on XP, maybe it will be fast enough for
Vista SP2 (Windows 7).
You do realize that SP2 for vista is coming out soon and it's not Windows 7, right?
Will be buying a new notebook soon (I hope) anyway.![]()
Well said Garyvdh!
Are the many thousands of contributors around the world suddenly and collectively going to close up shop? This article is nothing more than FUD, if you ask me.
and of course all the Linux users are actually going to go and BUY W7.
It is largely true Arthur, that M$ has dominated the market and used its monopoly to destroy competitors such as Borland and Lotus. M$ has pushed on us inferior products (OS/2 Warp WAS BETTER than run-atop-16bit-DOS-Windoze 95, ME was worse than 98SE, 98 and 95 should have been
98SE and Vista is a total dud while everyone is excited over Vista SP2 (7)).
For a long time Word for Windows couldn't copy-paste more than one page of text and formatting across properly. MS Office and other products were
artificially made obsolete and each new iteration of MS Operating Systems and applications brings more bloat. Windoze copied QuickTime in at attempt to get a functional Video for Windows functionality. M$ produced the ZUNE which trashed PlayForSure and partners like Creative, currently has a heavily DRM'ed non-transferrable mobile music solution and the origami dud etc etc...
Windows XP is GOOD enough for most people. Most people do not need DirectX 10 graphics, they don't need the eye-candy
and they don't need to trash a generation of adequate computers (1GB + Celeron is enough for 90% of consumer PC experience
short of recent games) to run a bloated, super expensive, new OS.
M$ just makes buggy, bloated software. The alternatives are better.
You do realise that Win 7 is Vista, right? Win 7 is SP2 - except that M$ will
charge you fanboys money for it. Enjoy the hype.![]()
Just because you say so doesnt make it true!
Loved the Article, Its spot on about Linux despite all the Linux fan boys on here who disagrees!![]()
Penguin attack incoming... brace yourself.... 5,4,3,2,1...
![]()
It is largely true Arthur, that M$ has dominated the market and used its monopoly to destroy competitors such as Borland and Lotus. M$ has pushed on us inferior products (OS/2 Warp WAS BETTER than run-atop-16bit-DOS-Windoze 95, ME was worse than 98SE, 98 and 95 should have been
98SE and Vista is a total dud while everyone is excited over Vista SP2 (7)).
For a long time Word for Windows couldn't copy-paste more than one page of text and formatting across properly. MS Office and other products were
artificially made obsolete and each new iteration of MS Operating Systems and applications brings more bloat. Windoze copied QuickTime in at attempt to get a functional Video for Windows functionality. M$ produced the ZUNE which trashed PlayForSure and partners like Creative, currently has a heavily DRM'ed non-transferrable mobile music solution and the origami dud etc etc...
Windows XP is GOOD enough for most people. Most people do not need DirectX 10 graphics, they don't need the eye-candy
and they don't need to trash a generation of adequate computers (1GB + Celeron is enough for 90% of consumer PC experience
short of recent games) to run a bloated, super expensive, new OS.
M$ just makes buggy, bloated software. The alternatives are better.
Is the windows 7 beta able to run (properly) on netbooks? It was slower than Vista on a P4 notebook with 512MB of memory in my case. Installed the normal 32bit version. Is there a version specific for netbooks then?
The 32 bit version of Win 7 runs quite nicely on my 2005 laptop (AMD 2.1 Ghz with 1.2 GB RAM).
Just because you say so doesnt make it true!
Loved the Article, Its spot on about Linux despite all the Linux fan boys on here who disagrees!![]()
Duncan MacCloud you re officially an idiot... nough said...