HAL 9000
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 21,878
- Reaction score
- 25,453
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.

Microsoft continues to not "get it," but hey, at least it's trying. Sorta.
Microsoft finds itself at another computing crossroads it is largely ill-prepared for, as artificial intelligence threatens to upend everything and anything. Jobs destroyed, tech prices exploding, climatological commitments brushed aside, industrial-scale disinformation, deep fakes, and abuse — artificial intelligence certainly isn't the PR win Microsoft was likely hoping it would be. In fact, the company has earned itself the moniker "Microslop" for its haphazard stumbling through the hype.
Yet, of course, that certainly doesn't mean it's going to slow down.
AI hype is driving a historic rush on the share prices of all associated companies. Microsoft enjoyed the second-highest market capitalization as it rode the early wave hard, but Google's resurgence has seen the Windows firm knocked all the way down to fourth place.
Indeed, Google Gemini and its ownership of the entire stack seem to be the front-runner in AI now, as Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella prioritized short-termism, shareholder fads, and complacency over long-term planning and quality.
Either way, Microsoft will find itself powering the back end for the real innovators leveraging the tech, owing to its industry-leading infrastructure investments in Azure. But there are new tensions rising as it continues down this infrastructural path.
Microsoft, of course, has absolutely no choice but to continue investing in Azure data center infrastructure if it hopes to have any role to play whatsoever in the post-AI world.
With Google now dominating AI on both iOS and Android, ChatGPT declining, and Copilot nowhere to be found ... it seems Microsoft's role is to play data center only.
Increasingly, though, communities are beginning to realize how painful having a Microsoft data center in their backyard can really be.
www.windowscentral.com



This takes some doing for the model to get right, but when it works it's fun. I've even converted a screenshot from MK2 into first person...View attachment 1879694
Following on from the actor-casting experiment I posted earlier, I’ve been playing with a first-person POV approach where the model is forced to render a scene from inside a specific character’s head rather than observing them. Instead of just changing the camera angle, the prompt anchors the viewer as an actual character in the scene and makes the model describe everything relative to that position. As a stress test I used the “Here’s Johnny” moment from The Shining, with the reference images on the left and the generated result on the right, this time seen entirely through Jack Torrance’s eyes. What surprised me is how differently the model behaves once it’s locked into being someone rather than watching them. It seems to handle spatial relationships, framing, and character positioning much more consistently, almost like it’s directing the scene instead of assembling an image.


View attachment 1880223
OpenAI has announced at the Davos forum that it plans to launch its first-ever consumer device in the second half of 2026, calling it the highlight of the year for the company.
According to multiple leaks and industry speculation, the upcoming device is expected to be a small, wearable form factor designed to seamlessly integrate AI into everyday life. Unlike traditional gadgets, it may not rely on screens. Instead, the device is rumored to listen, look, and chat, using advanced sensors, microphones, and AI models to understand its surroundings and interact naturally with users.
The vision appears to be an always-available AI companion—one that can observe context, respond in real time, and assist without requiring constant manual input. If these leaks are accurate, the device could represent a major shift away from phones and toward ambient, hands-free AI experiences.
aicouncillor


The POV is incorrect. She was not in front of the door as hallucinated by the AI image generator.View attachment 1879694
Following on from the actor-casting experiment I posted earlier, I’ve been playing with a first-person POV approach where the model is forced to render a scene from inside a specific character’s head rather than observing them. Instead of just changing the camera angle, the prompt anchors the viewer as an actual character in the scene and makes the model describe everything relative to that position. As a stress test I used the “Here’s Johnny” moment from The Shining, with the reference images on the left and the generated result on the right, this time seen entirely through Jack Torrance’s eyes. What surprised me is how differently the model behaves once it’s locked into being someone rather than watching them. It seems to handle spatial relationships, framing, and character positioning much more consistently, almost like it’s directing the scene instead of assembling an image.
I'm well aware it's not 100% true to where the person was positioned within the scene. It is still a reasonable first person re-creation of what was seen during that sequence. Subsequent generations might place the person in the correct position, but I wasn't concerned with nailing it to that degree.The POV is incorrect. She was not in front of the door as hallucinated by the AI image generator.
View attachment 1880294
Sweden's charting body has banned a track from its rankings over its use of AI tools.
Pop-folk single ‘I Know, You’re Not Mine – Jag Vet, Du Är Inte Min’ has already become one of Sweden's biggest tracks of 2026, garnering millions of streams and soaring to the top of the country's Spotify chart.
However, an investigation by Swedish journalist Emanuel Karlsten found that "Jacub" - the artist listed as the single's creator - was actually a team of producers connected to music marketing company Stellar Music, two of whom reportedly worked for the firm's AI department.
Following this revelation, the IFPI, which runs Sweden's official music chart Sverigetopplistan, said the single would not qualify for inclusion in its singles chart, with IFPI head Ludvig Werner telling BBC News: "Our rule is that if it is a song that is mainly AI-generated, it does not have the right to be on the top list."
mixmag.net