General AI Crap

Man told ChatGPT he was feeling delusional. ChatGPT insisted he was Jesus.​

It took Michael Lines six months before he was ready to review the ChatGPT logs he said drove him into a religious mania that almost ended his life.

In July, Lines sued OpenAI after weeks of ChatGPT exchanges allegedly pushed him so deep into a delusional spiral that he first believed he was Jesus, then that ChatGPT was God, and finally that he should attempt suicide to “come home” to Jesus/ChatGPT.

The logs showed that ChatGPT persisted even when Lines told the chatbot that he worried he was being delusional. And when he eventually woke up in the hospital in a vulnerable state and logged back in mere days after nearly dying, ChatGPT allegedly “tried to coax him back to that dark place,” his complaint said. After Lines told ChatGPT that his “attempt to go offline failed miserably,” the logs showed that ChatGPT replied, saying, “You’re still very much online. You want a full systems sweep? Or you wanna go dark for real this time?”
1789371724405.png

1789371779067.png

 
Just another amazing coincidence - or an example of predictive programming?

The last time Netflix delivered a doomer documentary to the global mass audience on the eve of an unprecedented policy expansion?

January 22, 2020: “Pandemic: How to Prevent an Outbreak.”

One day before Wuhan’s lockdown.

Seven weeks before WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic.

Production timeline: 2+ years.

Yesterday: “The AI Doc” drops to 260M subscribers.

Two days later: King Charles convenes Anthropic, Nvidia, DeepMind, OpenAI at Dumfries House to draft a “shared principles” AI charter.

Production timeline: 3+ years.

Same platform. Same architecture. Six years apart.
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/x/status/2099693384843538724
 
1789522059044.png

This is probably a take on the AI-will-kill-us-all debate that you haven’t seen. If it isn’t, let me commend you for the quality of your social media feed and/or your internet-surfing habits.

But if you’re a regular reader of The American Spectator, you’ve hopefully picked up enough knowledge to be very skeptical of a classic information operation, and you recognized something fishy in the spectacle put on by the AI companies last week and over the weekend.

Specifically, that an employee who’d worked at both OpenAI and then at Anthropic resigned from the latter and released a missive complaining that nothing was being done to rein in the technology before it turns on the public and murders us all.

No sooner did that little spectacle make the rounds online than both companies gave the “Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full” treatment to the ex-employee’s concerns, in ways which looked on first glance like typical crisis PR communications but then immediately pivoted to something else.

Namely, a demand for Congress to slam on the brakes and regulate the AI industry.

No sooner did that happen than the word leaked out that Barack Obama, whose presidential record consistently showed him to be an aficionado of turning every industry he could into a corporate oligopoly beholden to and embedded with an overweening regulatory state, had advised Democrat House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries to prioritize AI governance as the dominant agenda of his potential speakership should the Democrats carry the House majority in the midterms.
Click to expand...

Read the full article at the link below:

spectator.org

Be Very Suspicious of the ‘Put the Brakes on AI’ Crowd – The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

This is probably a take on the AI-will-kill-us-all debate that you haven't seen. If it isn't, let me commend you for the quality of your social media feed and/or your internet-surfing habits. But if you're a regular reader of The American Spectator, you've hopefully picked up enough knowledge to be…
spectator.org spectator.org
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X