General Photography

Nice.

Did you boost only shadows or the overall exposure?

And the color? Only contrast and white balance or a bit of saturation added too?
 
Nice.

Did you boost only shadows or the overall exposure?

And the color? Only contrast and white balance or a bit of saturation added too?
Boosted the shadows and brought the green under control.

There's more you can do with a jpg than people are willing to give credit to.
 
Definitely. I've transformed some bleak looking jpegs into decent looking images.
:(

Shoot RAW . You can always uncook the steak that way if you burn it too much .
jpegs are already processed in the camera before stored on the memory card - yes , you can work on them but why not have the total result of the sensor's capability on the PC to work with ?
 
:(

Shoot RAW . You can always uncook the steak that way if you burn it too much .
jpegs are already processed in the camera before stored on the memory card - yes , you can work on them but why not have the total result of the sensor's capability on the PC to work with ?
Sometimes shooting raw (it's not an acronym ;)) is unnecessary and even detrimental to the task at hand.
 
The noise reduction, saturation and even white balance with in camera jpeg is really good nowadays
 
Detrimental? Please explain.
On the computer side raw files take up a lot more hard drive space and take much more time to import and process. On the camera'a side they fill up buffers and cards quicker.

Now if you're shooting a couple hundred shots it's not going to make much of a difference but if you're shooting thousands - and remember time spent editing is time taken away from shooting - then it becomes a issue.

The juice ain't always worth the squeeze.
 
I do - and always will - shoot raw. If I feel that I can afford to, I drop down to a smaller size raw. But never jpeg alone. My clients are paying for quality, raw gives me the best chance of delivering the best quality I can.
 
We always shoot raw and jpeg. So am I wasting memory on the SD card doing that?
Shooting raw and jpg is like drinking rosé - make up your mind and commit. :p

There is rarely an advantage to it.

That said - SD cards are cheap.
 
Doing a lot of sports photography myself at times, I fully understand where bwana is coming from.

All other things I shoot raw as well.
 
Doing a lot of sports photography myself at times, I fully understand where bwana is coming from.

All other things I shoot raw as well.
It's not just sports I'll shoot in jpg - most editorial stuff doesn't warrant raw files. That is assuming you know how to set up your camera in the first place.
 
Has anybody here ever shot MotoX? Not the FMX thing like Nitro Circus or Red Bull X-Fighters but rather the racing including heats, qualifying, etc.

What setup would you recommend. What did you use? Any other tips would be appreciated.

I'm guessing a 400mm would be a bit overkill and that I'll mostly be shooting in the 70-200mm range.

Thank you.
 
Has anybody here ever shot MotoX? Not the FMX thing like Nitro Circus or Red Bull X-Fighters but rather the racing including heats, qualifying, etc.

What setup would you recommend. What did you use? Any other tips would be appreciated.

I'm guessing a 400mm would be a bit overkill and that I'll mostly be shooting in the 70-200mm range.

Thank you.

Some high level tips
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/content/10-tips-improve-your-aviation-photography

From the manufacturer of your camera...
http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Learn-An...b4u/taking-great-photographs-at-airshows.html

Another random site
http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2...ips-for-taking-amazing-pictures-of-airplanes/
 
Oh FFS! His on earth did I manage to misread your post so badly?

Haha. Must be still hangover from the Currie Cup victory. :D

Didn't you give me a video of a guy who explained exactly that?

I don't have anything left of those videos (remember the burglary) and I actually didn't watch all of them back them.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X